AI Rate Professor

English

Alexis Cattivera

EWRT1AT · EWRT2 · EWRT1 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Take her if and can handle a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardGreat FeedbackHeavy Writing LoadCaringFair but DemandingSlow Grading
  • , and meaningful lectures.
  • The course usually requires a lot of reading, papers, and steady weekly work.
  • Grades are often good, but the A usually comes from keeping up rather than coasting.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

Most students earned A grades, but comments show the A , and homework rather than minimal effort.

Online evidence stresses heavier weekly work, while but not easy A.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The material is not described as conceptually brutal, but the amount of reading and writing makes the course feel demanding.

Online reviews mention more workload pressure, while in-person reviews describe smoother classes with some paper-heavy moments.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

as mandatory in some sections and optional in others, so flexibility depends on the class.

Both online and , so the evidence varies by section.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

and care, but heavy workload and slow grading create real hesitation.

Online reviews are more divided, while severe workload complaint.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

as fair or lenient by some students, but others call her tough and .

Format shift

Online reviews conflict more on grading, while case.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of homework, many papers, and manageable.

Format shift

Online workload complaints are frequent, and overwhelming EWRT2 review.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students often value her feedback, care, and meaningful lectures, though a , and workload balance.

Format shift

Both formats include strong praise, but online reviews contain more criticism about course organization and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Reviews mainly mention essays, papers, reading, homework, participation, and .

Format shift

Both formats point to assignment-heavy assessment, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are generally positive about her classroom environment, care, and .

Main concern

The in EWRT2.

What students said

“Honestly, it was a fun class. and puts her students first!”
EWRT2
“ and it was a smooth flowing class.”
EWRT1
“Not an easy A, but the : Fair.”
EWRT2

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

students praise feedback and care but , and reading.

Main concern

The main online concern is the volume of essays, reading, and homework.

What students said

“there will be a lot more work than other professors but it's not unmanageable as long as you keep up with the assignments.”
EWRT1
“Prepare to write and read A LOT every week.”
EWRT1AT
“ . 5 essays (most of the professor do 3-4 essays), ”
EWRT1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , and the course appears mainly writing- and assignment-based.

Exam policy not clearly provenAssignment-heavy course

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, though one review mentions an in-class paper.

In-Class Paper
“4 Papers, 1 of which is in-class”
EWRT2

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Not an easy A, but the : Fair.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Reality

32/100

“Prepare to write and read A LOT every week.”

⚖️ Grade Fairness

58/100

“ but lenient.”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and puts her students first!
  • and it was a smooth flowing class.
  • .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Prepare to write and read A LOT every week.
  • there will be a lot more work than other professors but it's not unmanageable as long as you keep up with the assignments.
  • 5 essays (most of the professor do 3-4 essays),

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • Not an easy A, but the : Fair.
  • she is a and .
  • You get what you put into the class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 9 reviews span 2020 to 2025, include both formats, and repeatedly mention the same strengths and workload concerns.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

EWRT14 reviews
EWRT23 reviews
EWRT1AT2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

8

A 8

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values