AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Fatemeh Yarahmadi

MATH1C · MATH2B · MATH23 · MATH1D · MATH22H · MATH22 · MATH10 · 1D · MATH2A · 168 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
79.76%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a high grade with manageable math work, but if you need deep preparation for later courses.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy ACaringGroup WorkLenient GradingBusywork Risk
  • Students repeatedly describe her classes as easy A courses with many A grades and .
  • Her teaching is often praised as clear and , but some students say the depth is limited.
  • The main downside is structured busywork, group dependence, note checks, reflections, and occasional online organization issues.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

95/100

Getting an A is usually low effort because many reviews mention free A, , and grade recovery chances.

Both formats support an easy A, with online reviews stressing free grades and in and .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

86/100

The course content is often made easier , and simplified coverage.

Online reviews more often say the class lacks depth, while in person reviews more often say difficult math becomes manageable through support.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

, but several in person sections list mandatory attendance or required participation.

Online evidence is mostly optional attendance, while in and required class participation.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

84/100

and , though some warn that learning depth and online structure can be weak.

In person reviews are more strongly positive, while online reviews include more mixed comments about organization and busywork.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

92/100

Grading is highly generous because students cite , and many easy A outcomes.

Format shift

Both formats show lenient grading, with online reviews citing Canvas quizzes and curves and in person reviews citing group finals and .

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The workload is usually manageable, but repeated complaints mention , and small weekly tasks.

Format shift

Online reviews report more busywork and Canvas tasks, while in person reviews focus more on group activities and participation.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Students , and supportive, but some say she skips important depth or micromanages learning.

Format shift

In person teaching is praised more consistently, while online teaching has clearer complaints about video quality, communication, and organization.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment mixes exams, , and group finals rather than relying on one method.

Format shift

Online sections mention Canvas quizzes and exams more, while in , and presentations.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person reviews are more enthusiastic about her care, lectures, group activities, and .

Main concern

Some in , and note or participation tasks that feel controlling to some students.

What students said

“ ; she's probably the .”
MATH2A
“Just about impossible to fail, extremely hard to not get an A.”
MATH1C
“Shes nice but treats students like children.”
MATH2B

Remote format

Online

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews show very easy grading and , but , and weak organization.

Main concern

Online students may face formatting problems, many small tasks, and less consistent communication.

What students said

“Very chill prof and very chill class.”
MATH2A
“This was an asynch class, so it was a very easy A, but you don't go in concepts deep.”
MATH1D
“There are more than ten trivial tasks every week”
MATH2B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are usually student-friendly and review-based, but formats vary by course and some online .

Homework-Based TestsCanvas ExamsGroup FinalExam CorrectionsIn-Person Proctored Exams

Assessment risk

Varies

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person evidence supports group finals, student-selected exam problems, review-based questions, and fair tests, but not a .

Group FinalStudent-Selected QuestionsReview-Based ExamsFair Tests
“The ”
MATH1C
“Students pick the questions on the exams”
MATH2A
“she taught well and ”
MATH22

Online

Online evidence supports Canvas-based or homework-based exams in several classes, with one review explicitly saying .

Canvas ExamsHomework-Based TestsIn-Person Proctored ExamsStandard Tests
“ ”
MATH2A
“ ”
MATH1D
“The class was tba with in person exams.”
MATH22

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , but not for those who want to study in depth.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and learning depth. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“Great lecturer, explains complex concepts in detail with multiple examples.”

📈 Easy A Signal

95/100

“EASIEST CLASS EVER! if you can.”

⚖️

92/100

“She gives people tons of chances to make up their grade and .”

⚠️ Learning Depth

62/100

“ , but not for those who want to study in depth.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing professor who cares about her students.
  • and .
  • Great lecturer, explains complex concepts in detail with multiple examples.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you want an easy A.
  • Light workload; Free A;
  • Just about impossible to fail, extremely hard to not get an A.

Theme 3

🧩 About Workload & Structure

  • Shes nice but treats students like children.
  • There are more than ten trivial tasks every week
  • All personal notes taken are also graded for completeness and clarity, unnecessary for a college level course.

Theme 4

🧠 About Learning Depth

  • If you want to go deeper into the material, this is not the class for you.
  • I don't understand linear algebra well enough coming out.
  • , but not for those who want to study in depth.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

168

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 50 recent reviews across online and in person formats with consistent grade, workload, teaching, and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5121
4 out of 514
3 out of 514
2 out of 58
1 out of 511

Course coverage

MATH2A12 reviews
MATH229 reviews
MATH2B9 reviews
1D5 reviews
MATH1C5 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MATH1D4 reviews
MATH233 reviews
MATH22H2 reviews
MATH101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

50 reported outcomes

A range

40

A+ 5 · A 31 · A- 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

10

Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 6 · Rather not say 2