AI Rate Professor

Counseling

Pauline Wethington

COUN200 · CLP4136 · HUMA20 · HUMA30 · D010 · HUMA10 · HUMADO10 · CLP70 · 88 lifetime ratings

AI rating
81/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
76.32%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Take her if you value support and practical guidance, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring supportCareer guidanceClear feedbackPolarizing gradingWorkload complaints
  • Most students describe her as , and useful for career or transfer planning.
  • Grades are often high, but some students report , and heavy reading or papers.
  • Online and in-person reviews are both mixed, with , and counseling tone.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Many students report A grades, but the A , and attention to grading details.

Online evidence shows many A grades with some quiz complaints, while in person evidence includes both easy A reports and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The course content is generally practical and beginner friendly, though some students find the readings, quizzes, and .

Online reviews emphasize manageable content with , while in person reviews are more split on difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

62/100

, but several reviews list it as mandatory depending on course or term.

Both online and in , so flexibility appears to vary.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Most students recommend her for caring support and practical guidance, but a meaningful and poor tone.

Online reviews are mostly favorable with recent warnings, while in person reviews are more polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

64/100

High A counts suggest fair-to-lenient outcomes, but and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention clear criteria and some harsh deductions, while in person .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload is usually manageable, but repeated comments mention , and .

Format shift

Online workload concerns focus on repetitive assignments and quizzes, while in person concerns include lots of homework and reading.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most students praise her as caring and helpful, but serious negative , and .

Format shift

Online reviews lean positive with assignment complaints, while in person reviews show stronger polarization.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews mention assignments, papers, quizzes, and a final, so assessment appears .

Format shift

Online evidence mentions Canvas assignments and quizzes, while in , and a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person reviews are sharply split between strong praise for career help and , and workload.

Main concern

Some in and poor counseling interactions.

What students said

“With her guidance, I was accepted into all the universities I applied to.”
CLP70
“Her tone is so disrespectful and she does not care to hear you out.”
COUN200

Remote format

Online

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly positive about support and clarity, but several recent students , and .

Main concern

Some online students say assignments and .

What students said

“She is incredibly helpful and on assignments.”
CLP70
“Ridiculous quizzes with badly worded, confusing problems, takes a .”
CLP70

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and a , but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, webcam use, or Lockdown Browser.

QuizzesFinal Exam MentionedNo Clear Proctoring EvidenceNo Clear Open-Book Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews mention quizzes and a , but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

QuizzesFinal Exam MentionedTest Heavy
“none of the content in it will be on the .”
CLP70
“Not sure if the professor has read the entire textbook but the .”
CLP70

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam .

QuizzesNo Clear Proctoring EvidenceNo Clear Open-Book Evidence
“ ”
CLP70

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Wethington is one of the most caring and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“She genuinely cares about her students' success and is always willing to help.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

76/100

“ .”

⚖️

64/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Reality

55/100

“She also gave the but time consuming) despite it being a stress management class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She explained the material clearly, was always willing to answer questions, and provided the support and encouragement I needed to succeed.
  • Professor Wethington is genuinely one of the best professors at De Anza College.
  • Not helpful as a counselor. I am a new student and she was insulting me with attitude.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The class wasn't hard but .
  • Incredibly easy course but $50 textbook is annoying.
  • 2-3 chapters a , so we have no clue on what we do wrong.

Theme 3

🧭 About Career Support

  • Because of Prof Wethington, I was able to land my dream job.
  • With her guidance, I was accepted into all the universities I applied to.
  • This class didn't provide. Just added more coursework.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

88

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across several years and both formats give strong evidence, though some opinions are unusually polarized.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 558
4 out of 57
3 out of 53
2 out of 57
1 out of 514

Course coverage

CLP7022 reviews
HUMA1015 reviews
HUMA305 reviews
COUN2003 reviews
HUMA202 reviews
Show 3 more courses
CLP41361 review
D0101 review
HUMADO101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

49 reported outcomes

A range

36

A+ 6 · A 28 · A- 2

B range

6

B+ 4 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Not sure yet 7