AI Rate Professor

English

Luis Limcolioc

ENG1A · D001A · ENGLISH · ENGLI1B · ENGLISH1B · ENGLC1001 · ENGLIGH2 · ENGLISH2ONLINE · 1A · EWRIT2 · EWRTA · EWRT1A · LITERATURE · 100B · ENGL1B · EWRT2A · ERWT2 · ENGLISH2 · 299 lifetime ratings

AI rating
5/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
43.92%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you need a fair path to an A or .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerExtremely Harsh GradingUnclear FeedbackHeavy Writing LoadAI Accusation ConcernsAvoid For GPA
  • Recent comments are overwhelmingly negative and , and .
  • Students repeatedly say getting an A is very difficult even with effort.
  • The main issue is not the intellectual content alone, but and poor communication.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Students repeatedly say an A is unlikely because , and offers little recovery through .

Both formats show severe A-risk, with online reviews adding and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

The writing work itself may be manageable, but and strict essay standards make the course feel difficult.

Online and and feedback rather than from content alone.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

52/100

Attendance evidence is mixed and often missing, so the reviews do .

Online reviews include both mandatory and non-mandatory signals, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

The because students feel the , and not matched by useful support.

Both online and advantage.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

5/100

Students repeatedly say he rarely gives high grades, gives no , and .

Format shift

Both formats show harsh grading, with online and AI-related concerns.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Reviews mention many essays, discussion posts, quizzes, and writing assignments, though .

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly writing volume more directly, while and feedback.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Most recent reviews describe poor , and low support.

Format shift

Both formats are negative, and online reviews add repeated complaints about copied or .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Assessment appears , and quizzes rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

, while exam evidence is limited.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are also strongly , and limited useful feedback.

Main concern

Students repeatedly report , and little support.

What students said

“No chance of scoring an A.”
ENGL-C1001
“ . IMPOSSIBLE FOR AN A no matter how hard you try.”
ENGLISH1B
“ . The and expectations are unclear.”
ENGL1B

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews , and recurring concerns about AI-related accusations.

Main concern

Students say and grades are hard to recover.

What students said

“ .”
ENGL1B
“At least 3-4 writing assignments per week.”
D001A
“grades with AI and leaves same sentence as ”
ENGL-C1001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , and most , and writing work.

Quiz MentionsWriting AssignmentsEssaysDiscussion Posts

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book format, take-home format, midterm format, or .

EssaysQuizzesDiscussion Posts
“Course contains lots of and 4 8-paragraph essays in total.”
EWRT1A
“ .”
ENGLISH1B
“Aside from if you try.”
ERWT2

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, take-home exams, midterm format, or .

Writing AssignmentsDiscussion PostsQuiz Mentions
“At least 3-4 writing assignments per week.”
D001A
“I am paying tuition fee just to get Bs or Cs here...”
ENGLISH1B
“He will put YOU TO WORK and have no grade boosts.”
EWRT1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . DONT TAKE HIS CLASS PLEASE.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting repeated themes in , and recommendation risk; credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️

5/100

“No chance of scoring an A.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“ and doesn't really help you improve.”

📚 Workload

22/100

“At least 3-4 writing assignments per week.”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • . IMPOSSIBLE FOR AN A no matter how hard you try.
  • Never gives his students a full 100 and .
  • Avoid taking his class. , and tends to be unnecessarily harsh.

Theme 2

💬 And Communication

  • - but barely.
  • He copy/pastes the .
  • my emails were not answered.

Theme 3

📄 About Workload And Assignments

  • Course contains lots of and 4 8-paragraph essays in total.
  • There are so many other professors that have a good amount of
  • The course includes many discussion posts, and the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

299

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because the negative pattern is highly consistent across 50 reviews, but many reviews are clustered in March 2026 and some are brief.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5107
4 out of 566
3 out of 528
2 out of 524
1 out of 574

Course coverage

ENGL1B10 reviews
ENGLISH1B6 reviews
ENGL-C10014 reviews
ENGLIGH24 reviews
ENGLISH2ONLINE4 reviews
Show 13 more courses
ERWT24 reviews
EWRT1A3 reviews
100B2 reviews
1A2 reviews
ENG1A2 reviews
ENGLISH22 reviews
D001A1 review
ENGLI1B1 review
ENGLISH1 review
EWRIT21 review
EWRT2A1 review
EWRTA1 review
LITERATURE1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

7

A 4 · A- 3

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

2

C- 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 3