AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Valeria Martinovic

D030A · D025A · CHEM30A · CHEM1A · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless , and handle difficult exams with limited support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTest heavyRushed lecturesALEKS workloadMixed gradingWeak support
  • Most students describe the class as difficult, test-heavy, and poorly supported by lectures.
  • Some students report and labs.
  • Online reviews are , and poor alignment between teaching and tests.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Some students earned A grades through boosts or lenient labs, but , and rushed preparation.

, while online evidence makes the A feel much harder.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Chemistry content is challenging, and students say lectures often do not explain the math or .

Online reviews describe the course as especially hard, while but still difficult overall.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

classes and some reviews saying attendance was not mandatory.

and one mandatory review, while in-person rules vary by section.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most students do not recommend her because lectures feel rushed or unclear and .

Online recommendations are clearly negative, while but remains mixed to negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

56/100

and grade boosts, but and limited attempts keep it from feeling broadly generous.

Format shift

In-person has the strongest leniency evidence, while because and specific.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students repeatedly mention , and test preparation.

Format shift

Both formats include heavy-workload evidence, with online reviews emphasizing ALEKS and labs.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Many students describe rushed , and limited empathy, despite a few positive step-by-step reports.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is poor, while outliers.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Assessment , and few major graded items.

Format shift

Online reviews clearly mention three exams and Canvas tests, while and ALEKS.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with some students praising lenient grading but many , and .

Main concern

Teaching quality and student support are inconsistent.

What students said

“She was quite rushed during lectures.”
CHEM1A
“Very lenient with .”
D025A

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, citing hard exams, lecture-heavy delivery, weak preparation, and .

Main concern

and poorly aligned with lectures.

What students said

“ and too specific.”
CHEM30A
“ !”
CHEM30A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are usually described as difficult, specific, rushed, and not always well aligned with lectures.

Canvas Multiple ChoiceDifficult ExamsLimited Test TimeFormula Card Mentioned

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and one formula-card policy, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules.

Homework-Based ExamsLimited Test TimeFormula Card
“ ALEKS.”
CHEM1A
“She didn't offer enough time for .”
CHEM1A
“she lets you bring formula card in the exam”
CHEM30A

Online

Online reviews mention Canvas multiple-choice tests, two midterms, a final, and difficult exams, but .

Canvas Multiple ChoiceTwo MidtermsFinal ExamDifficult Exams
“3 exams: 2 midterms, 1 final.”
CHEM30A
“ and too specific.”
CHEM30A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Doable class that lacks passion”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“Her explanations during lectures could've been more specific, especially for the math problems.”

🧪

30/100

“ and too specific.”

⚖️

56/100

“Very lenient with .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She was quite rushed during lectures.
  • .
  • She was pretty good at explaining things step by step.

Theme 2

🧪 About Exams and Workload

  • We used ALEKS.
  • and too specific.
  • She didn't offer enough time for .

Theme 3

⚖️ About Grades

  • Very lenient with .
  • Everyone gets a full grade on the lab reports unless you don't submit them.
  • ALEKS.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 12 reviews show a consistent negative pattern, but course levels and dates vary and a few reviews strongly disagree.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CHEM30A7 reviews
CHEM1A3 reviews
D025A1 review
D030A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 2 · A 3 · A- 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values