AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Intercultural Studies

Shanita Ealey

ICS11 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
54.55%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you can work independently and accept heavy writing with limited online support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMostly absent onlineHeavy reading and writingUnclear directionsLate grading and little feedbackInspirational in person
  • Online reviews are mostly negative because students describe poor , and .
  • In-person reviews are older but much stronger, praising her passion, clarity, and meaningful discussions.
  • Grades can be high, but , and strict expectations.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

High grades appear possible, but students , and strict penalties for some assignments.

Online evidence shows high grades with high effort and , while in-person evidence shows effort-heavy work with some .

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

The course content is not described as conceptually advanced, but the , and .

Online reviews make the course feel harder through poor organization, while as meaningful reading and discussion.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

67/100

as not mandatory, while and often expect participation.

Online reviews support flexible attendance, while two of as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Recent online students often warn against the class because of , and .

Online reviews are mostly negative, while the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Some students earned A or A+ grades, but comments mention , and little chance to resubmit.

Format shift

Online reviews show stricter and less predictable grading, while and .

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and group work.

Format shift

Both formats describe heavy work, with and frustrating.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Recent online reviews strongly criticize her absence, unclear instructions, poor communication, and lack of .

Format shift

Online teaching experience is mostly poor, while as , and inspiring.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

24/100

Reviews emphasize discussion posts, , and group projects more than exams.

Format shift

Online evidence centers on weekly discussion posts, essays, and presentations, while , and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

but strongly positive, describing an inspiring class with lots of , and participation.

Main concern

The class requires substantial writing and active participation.

What students said

“there's a lot of reading and writing involved in this class”
ICS11
“I absolutely loved this class and got so much out of it thanks to Shani!”
ICS11
“She's an excellent ”
ICS11

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe a mostly self-taught course with , and weak communication.

Main concern

Students repeatedly say she is not present and .

What students said

“This teacher did not even teach, she acted like we were a burden on her day”
ICS11
“ .”
ICS11
“She rarely responds , and grades late.”
ICS11

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the , and the course , and presentations than exams.

Exam Policy UnclearFinal PresentationAssignment-Heavy Assessment

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book policy, midterm format, or .

Exam Policy UnclearReflection PapersGroup Project
“You are expected to participate in class and a group project.”
ICS11

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

Exam Policy UnclearFinal PresentationDiscussion PostsWeekly Essays
“For the minute”
ICS11
“Your entire .”
ICS11

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She rarely responds , and grades late.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, separating recent online complaints from older in-person praise while , and workload themes.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“This teacher did not even teach, she acted like we were a burden on her day”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“Your entire .”

⚖️

32/100

“if you didn't write the you a zero for that assignment and no chance for resubmission.”

👍 In-Person Strength

68/100

“She's an excellent ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Presence

  • and does not communicate.
  • She rarely responds , and grades late.
  • At times it felt like I was interacting with a robot.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Get ready to read!
  • Super time consuming.
  • there's a lot of reading and writing involved in this class
  • A good amount of reading but it is all very interesting

Theme 3

❤️ About Impact

  • Will carry these lessons throughout my lifetime.
  • I left her class enlightened and inspired to make a change.
  • the material she provided was life-changing

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

The evidence includes 11 reviews with strong comment detail, but online reviews are recent while .

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ICS1111 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 3 · A 3

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values