AI Rate Professor

Mathematics & Statistics

Danny Tran

MATH1A · MAT10 · MATHD031 · STATS10 · 1A · MATH32 · PRECAL13 · MATH10 · MATH1B · 206 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
83.97%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take him if you can keep up with and want a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear lecturesExtra creditLots of homeworkCaring supportPractice-based exams
  • Most students praise him as , and very helpful.
  • Grades are often reachable because and is common.
  • The main , and frequent exams in some sections.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A is very reachable with , and , but it is not effortless because many students mention heavy work.

Online reviews are split between easy A and heavy workload, while and practice-aligned exams.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The and repeated practice, but workload and pace make it harder for some students.

; online reviews show more complaints about pace and volume.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

, and some reviews mention mandatory attendance or for showing up.

Both online and , so flexibility depends on the class.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

84/100

and support, but workload-heavy sections create real hesitation.

, while online reviews are more divided.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

, dropped scores, rounding, and exams based on practice problems .

Format shift

Leniency is clearer in in-person reviews; online reviews include more workload and .

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Many students mention , and long assignments even when they like the professor.

Format shift

Both formats mention workload, but online reviews are more likely to call it excessive.

Teaching experience

Good

86/100

Most reviews describe him as , and responsive, though a few students found his notes disorganized or too fast-paced.

Format shift

, while online feedback includes a few sharper complaints.

Assessment method

Balanced

66/100

Assessment , and final work.

Format shift

Both formats mention exams and many components.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are strongly positive overall and , and accessible help.

Main concern

fair.

What students said

“His examples/study guides were the same as the exams”
MATH10
“Offers tons of !”
MATH10
“There is a lot of , but if you stay on top of it, it won't be an issue.”
MATH10

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are more mixed, with some easy A reports and some strong complaints about workload and pace.

Main concern

Online sections can feel workload-heavy and fast-paced.

What students said

“If you use his and your notes from lecture videos, you will get an easy A in all of his test.”
MAT10
“Decent professor, only downside is how much work there is.”
MATH10
“Very fast paced class.”
MAT10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are usually fair and close to notes or practice problems, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

Practice-Based ExamsNotes Allowed In Some SectionsExtra CreditMidtermsFinal Exam

Assessment risk

Standard

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, or practice problems, with some sections allowing a notes page.

Practice-Based ExamsNotes Page AllowedExtra Credit
“ and four tests, and he let us use a page of notes.”
MATHD031
“ as the lecture notes.”
MATH32
“His examples/study guides were the same as the exams”
MATH10

Online

, and projects, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.

MidtermFinal ExamPractice Problems
“ .”
MAT10
“4 chapter exams 1 final exam 2 labs and .”
MATH10
“Only 1 midterm in summer quarter.”
MAT10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Danny is an exceptional professor. There is a lot of , but if you stay on top of it, it won't be an issue.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“He knew what he was teaching very well and explained even simple concepts very well.”

📚 Workload Reality

38/100

“ way to part J long.”

📈 Grade Path

78/100

“ as the lecture notes.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are just extremely engaging and helpful.
  • , and is very respectful.

Theme 2

📈

  • Gives so much free credit as well.
  • All quizzes and and lecture notes.
  • He kindly rounded it to a A.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Workload

  • Take if you're unemployed with free time.
  • and engaging lecture, but
  • A lot of HW especially near the end of the quarter.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

206

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews cover both formats with many detailed comments and consistent themes despite some mixed experiences.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5156
4 out of 522
3 out of 511
2 out of 54
1 out of 513

Course coverage

MATH1027 reviews
MAT1011 reviews
MATH325 reviews
MATH1A2 reviews
1A1 review
Show 4 more courses
MATH1B1 review
MATHD0311 review
PRECAL131 review
STATS101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

50 reported outcomes

A range

33

A+ 6 · A 22 · A- 5

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 3

C range

3

C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

9

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 8