AI Rate Professor

Environmental Studies

Joshua (Josh) McCluskey

ESCI1 · ESCI1L · ES1 · ESCI19 · 30 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
76%
Difficulty
1.9

The decision

if you want a , but plan for field trips or steady online assignments.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlySupportive and caringVery easy gradingField-trip based labsClear feedbackAttendance and directions matter
  • Students repeatedly describe him as kind, flexible, and invested in their success.
  • Most students say the class is easy to pass or earn an A in, especially the lab courses.
  • The main issues , and occasional online grading delays.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

91/100

Most students report A-range grades, easy assignments, , and , though showing up and completing work still matters.

Online evidence shows easy lab work with some heavier ES1 assignments, while .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

86/100

The course content is usually described as easy, practical, and beginner-friendly, especially in environmental lab sections.

Online reviews mention simple observation work but more reading or videos in ES1, while and field trips.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

Attendance is sometimes marked optional, but , and passing.

, while and field-trip participation are more important.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Students recommend him because , and usually makes the class easy and useful.

Both formats are mostly recommended, but online ES1 and feedback.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

Students repeatedly call him an easy or fair grader, with and flexible late-work support in several reviews.

Format shift

Online lab reviews mention fair grading and pushed-back deadlines, while and easy A outcomes.

Workload

Light

78/100

Most lab reviews describe light weekly work, but ES1 online , and essay-length assignments.

Format shift

Online workload ranges from very light ESCI1L to heavier ES1, while but tied to field trips.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Most students describe him as caring, clear, funny, knowledgeable, and supportive, with a .

Format shift

Online reviews praise support and responsiveness, while in-person reviews praise class energy and practical field learning.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades appear mostly based on labs, observations, journals, assignments, group presentations, and occasional reflection-style finals.

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly assignments and reflection finals, while , and group presentations.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are especially strong for ESCI1L, where students describe easy labs, field trips, group work, and .

Main concern

Field trips and up or find locations.

What students said

Incredibly easygoing class.
ESCI1L
the directions to the location of these
ESCI1L

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews are mostly positive, with low workload in lab courses but some complaints about ES1 assignment volume and .

Main concern

Some online ES1 students , and .

What students said

Easiest college class I've taken thus far.
ESCI1L
2-3 assignments per week that .
ES1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because reviews mostly describe assignments, reflections, journals, and group .

Reflection FinalGroup Presentation FinalAssignment-Based AssessmentReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and class assignments, but do not clearly prove closed-book exams or strict proctoring.

Group Presentation FinalField ReportsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Closed-Book Exams
The environmental impact.
ESCI1L
1 final group presentation about your experience in class.
ESCI1L

Online

Online reviews mention a and tests based on assigned materials, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Reflection FinalTests Based On NotesReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring
The final was a reflection with 4 long answer questions.
ESCI1L
watch/read them and keep your notes if
ES1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

and understanding. He accepted late work and was a .

Voice snapshots generated from 30 reviews, highlighting recurring themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

He shows genuine care, both for his students, and what he teaches.

📈 Easy A Signal

91/100

Try hard while in class and it's an easy A.

⚠️ Main Concern

48/100

the directions to the location of these

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great labs and a super down to earth guy!
  • Josh is super cool! He's very knowledgeable in the subject he teaches.
  • He shows genuine care, both for his students, and what he teaches.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Best and Easiest class ever, use this class
  • He offers .
  • Show up and you are good! Easy as hell

Theme 3

⚠️ About Workload & Logistics

  • 2-3 assignments per week that .
  • There are many field trips (some 30 mins away).
  • If you don't drive, then that will be an issue, so make friends and carpool :)

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

30

Recent reviews read by the AI

30

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 30 reviews span many years, include both online and in-person formats, and show a consistent positive pattern with .

Inside 30 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 520
4 out of 53
3 out of 56
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ESCI1L23 reviews
ES15 reviews
ESCI11 review
ESCI191 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

23

A+ 10 · A 11 · A- 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1