AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Linlin Zhang

MATH1C · MATH1A · MATH2B · MATH43 · MATH1D · MATH31 · MATH22 · MATH41 · MATH42 · MATH10 · MATH12 · MATH1B · MATH114 · 76 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
75.41%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a supportive math professor and are , and study for exams.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear notesCaring supportCheat sheets allowedExtra creditParticipation matters
  • Most students describe Zhang as , and beginner-friendly, especially when they use her notes.
  • Getting an A is realistic, but recent Math 1B reviews warn that .
  • In-person classes often require attendance or participation, while online reviews are more mixed because .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A is very reachable because many reviews mention notes, cheat sheets, , and , but recent calculus reviews say exams still need regular study.

In-person evidence is more consistently EasyA, while online evidence ranges from easy async .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The math content can be real college-level work, but , and review materials make it easier to handle.

In-person comments often say the teaching makes hard material manageable, while online and course timing.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Attendance is often mandatory or tied to in-class work for in-person classes, but many .

Online classes are usually more flexible, while points.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Most students recommend her because , and gives useful notes, though some warn about tough or poorly aligned tests.

In-person reviews are more enthusiastic, while online reviews and workload.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Grades are often helped by , corrections, dropped work, notes, cheat sheets, and fair criteria, despite a .

Format shift

In-person grading looks more lenient overall, while older and proctoring.

Workload

Moderate

56/100

, but , and some heavy online courses keep the workload from being light.

Format shift

In-person workload is usually moderate, while online workload is more uneven and sometimes described as lots of work.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Students , and caring support, though some reviews mention mistakes, disorganization, or .

Format shift

In-person teaching reviews are strongly positive, while online reviews are more mixed because of asynchronous structure and .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and exams, with tests still carrying meaningful weight in many classes.

Format shift

Online reviews mention tests more heavily, while , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are strongly positive overall, with , and manageable grading appearing often.

Main concern

Attendance and participation often matter, and some students say .

What students said

“Great teacher. Offers some . .”
MATH1B
“If you want an A . Her class is not easy.”
MATH1B
“Professor Zhang is by far the .”
MATH114

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed, with newer comments calling the class easy and organized while older comments mention heavy work and .

Main concern

Older online reviews raise concerns about proctored tests, no-backtracking test design, and .

What students said

“Very easy class as long as you do the hw and study a little.”
Math2B
“I would still recommend it, just be prepared for lots of work.”
MATH10
“She uses Proctor for tests and she wants you to so don't try to skip a few steps or do it mentally.”
MATH114

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam rules vary by course and format, with many student-friendly note policies but .

Cheat Sheets AllowedOpen Notes QuizzesProctored Online TestsNo Backtracking Online TestsTest Corrections

Assessment risk

Varies

66/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews often mention cheat sheets, paper notes, open-note quizzes, and straightforward or .

Cheat Sheets AllowedOpen Notes QuizzesPaper Notes AllowedMidterm And Final
“Cheat sheets allowed for exams.”
MATH1B
“1 midterm and .”
MATH1A
“Exams were straightforward (with notes sheets allowed!), and the .”
MATH12

Online

Online reviews clearly mention both open-note exams and stricter proctored or no-backtracking tests, so the .

Open NoteProctored TestsNo BacktrackingNo Camera Or Audio In One Review
“4 exams, 1 final - all open note”
MATH1B
“But for the and you can not look back at ur previous questions or work on other questions.”
MATH114
“The problems on the , and you won't be able to go back once you move on to the next one.”
MATH1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Zhang is by far the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“Professor Zhang is by far the .”

📈 Grade Value

78/100

“You don't need that much work to get a good grade if .”

⚠️

66/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The and presented at a slow pace.
  • She really cares about thoroughly explaining concepts and takes the time to answer questions.
  • She made me interested in math again.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Professor Zhang's class is easy to get an A in.
  • Getting an A or B is doable, but
  • If you want an A . Her class is not easy.

Theme 3

📝 About Exams And Workload

  • Cheat sheets allowed for exams.
  • 2 long assignments per week.
  • , and to only be taken during class time on canvas Included fill in the blank, MC, and show your work.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

76

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

The dataset has 50 reviews across several years and courses, with detailed and mostly , and exams.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 545
4 out of 515
3 out of 58
2 out of 54
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH1B12 reviews
MATH109 reviews
MATH1A8 reviews
MATH1146 reviews
Math1D3 reviews
Show 8 more courses
MATH313 reviews
MATH412 reviews
MATH432 reviews
MATH121 review
MATH1C1 review
MATH221 review
Math2B1 review
MATH421 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

46 reported outcomes

A range

29

A+ 6 · A 21 · A- 2

B range

13

B+ 3 · B 10

C range

3

C+ 2 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1