AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Mathematics Statistics

Lilit Mazmanyan

MATH1C · MATHD012 · D001A · MATHD011 · MATH43 · MATH32 · MATH1D · D001B · MATH22 · MATH42 · MATH10 · MATH2A · 81 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
80.25%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take Lilit Mazmanyan if you are willing to keep up with homework and want a fair math professor who gives many chances to succeed.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of Extra CreditFair Exam PrepCaring and UnderstandingHomework-DrivenAccent Can Be Hard
  • Students strongly value her , fairness, and caring attitude.
  • guides, making effort pay off.
  • The , and some self-study needs.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

79/100

An A is realistic because exams mirror homework and is common, but and practice.

Both formats support an Easy A with effort, while and online reviews emphasize WebAssign alignment.

Is the course easy?

Standard

54/100

The math content is not always easy, but , and cheat sheets reduce surprises.

and WebAssign dependence, while in-person reviews describe more guided class practice.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

44/100

, and many in-person classes reward showing up through group work, participation, or .

, while in-person attendance is frequently mandatory or practically important.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Students recommend her because , and gives .

Both formats are mostly recommended, but online reviews include , and self-study.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

, extensions, dropped scores, partial credit, and similar exam problems make grading forgiving when students do the work.

Format shift

and attendance-based points, while online reviews add extensions and partial credit through uploaded work.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

and quizzes or exams are frequent, but most students say the work prepares them well.

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly WebAssign and quizzes, while .

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

, and fair, though a minority struggle with accent, long lectures, or slide-heavy teaching.

Format shift

In-person reviews are more consistently enthusiastic, while and lecture-focus complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

, and group work, with homework mainly used for practice or preparation.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize WebAssign quizzes and exams, while and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are highly positive about practice problems, , support, and , but attendance and group work often matter.

Main concern

Missing class can cost easy group work, participation, or points.

What students said

and practice problems (if not easier) and as long as you do the work you will do well!
D001B
She literally gives opportunity for every single class.
MATHD011
but she's very lenient and .
D001B

Remote format

Online

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews praise , WebAssign alignment, recorded or flexible lectures, and caring support, but , and self-study.

Main concern

if lectures are .

What students said

Quiz and from the homework assignments.
MATH2A
and her teaching is great.
MATHD011
She will ask you to share screen + but they were on webassign.
MATH22

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because and allow support tools, but some online sections mention screen sharing or timed uploads.

WebAssign ExamsHomework-Like QuestionsCheat SheetsExtra CreditSome Online Proctoring

Assessment risk

Varies

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams are usually based on homework, practice problems, study guides, and cheat sheets, with helping recovery.

Homework-Like ExamsCheat SheetsPractice ProblemsExtra CreditMultiple Midterms
she provides practice problems, hw, and EC .
D001B
You always get a cheat sheet.
MATHD011
but based on the study guide or .
MATHD011

Online

and , but comments conflict on proctoring because some say not proctored while another mentions screen and camera requirements.

WebAssign ExamsHomework-Like QuestionsTimed ExamsWork UploadSome Proctoring
and so they're pretty much exactly like the homework.
MATH1D
and her teaching is great.
MATHD011
She will ask you to share screen + but they were on webassign.
MATH22

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

Provides a lot of opportunities for , does many practice problems that are seen on the exams and grades very fairly.

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

❤️ Teaching Support

86/100

Super sweet and caring prof. Gives out EC like candy and so nobody feels behind.

📈 Effort Pays Off

79/100

and practice problems (if not easier) and as long as you do the work you will do well!

⚖️

82/100

There are many opportunities and !

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • but she's very lenient and .
  • .
  • Had to work hard for my A.

Theme 2

🧪 About Exams

  • and practice problems.
  • You always get a cheat sheet.
  • Tests are not stressful - had like 9 questions then last was a file upload.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She genuinely cares about her students and makes sure that they have the resources they need to succeed.
  • and kind.
  • She is so understanding and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

81

Lifetime ratings

95/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 50 reviews across online and in-person formats, many recent comments, and , and exams.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 554
4 out of 511
3 out of 59
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

D001B8 reviews
D001A7 reviews
MATH227 reviews
MATHD0117 reviews
MATH106 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH1C5 reviews
MATH1D3 reviews
MATH322 reviews
MATH422 reviews
MATH2A1 review
MATH431 review
MATHD0121 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

45 reported outcomes

A range

38

A+ 10 · A 23 · A- 5

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 4