AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Child Development Education

Julie Kennedy

PSYCH10G · PYSC10G · FCS070 · CD12 · FCS102 · FCS70 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
88.89%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Take Julie Kennedy in person if you want a and are ready to participate, but be cautious with older online sections.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyDeeply CaringParticipation HeavyClear ExpectationsHeavy ReadingStrong Feedback
  • In-person students overwhelmingly describe her as caring, fair, supportive, and clear.
  • The class is not effortless because , and deadlines matter.
  • Online reviews are much weaker and repeatedly mention disorganization and last-minute workload.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

63/100

Good grades are common, but they , and timely assignments.

, while online evidence shows easy grades but a stressful workload process.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The content is manageable, but the , and written work.

and learning, while online reviews emphasize workload confusion more than content difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as mandatory and say participation or daily class work matters.

, while online reviews vary but still show strict workload expectations.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

89/100

Students recommend her because , and deeply invested in student growth.

The strong recommendation , while online reviews are much less favorable.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Students call her fair and supportive, but several reviews , and participation-based standards.

Format shift

, while online reviews show grades can still be high despite frustration.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Many reviews mention heavy reading, , and last-minute online assignments.

Format shift

In-person workload is structured and participation-heavy, while online workload is criticized as disorganized and overwhelming.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

In-person students consistently describe her as , and invested in student success.

Format shift

In-person teaching evidence is excellent, while the small online sample is much weaker because of organization issues.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Assessment appears driven more , and assignments than by major exams.

Format shift

In-person reviews emphasize participation and group work, while and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are highly positive, describing a , and meaningful participation.

Main concern

Attendance and active participation are usually required to succeed.

What students said

“She's a and encourages your growth.”
CD12
“Take this class! You will work hard, but learn so much!”
FCS070
“Expects a lot from students, but offers support when needed!”
PSYCH10G

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are negative compared with work, and disorganization despite quick responses or kindness.

Main concern

Assignment timing and due .

What students said

“assigns tons of work last minute and expects us to finish everything within a short time frame??”
PYSC10G
“Nice, but .”
PSYCH10G
“ and when the due dates were.”
PSYCH10G

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and tests, but and do not clearly prove strict proctoring or open-book rules.

QuizzesBook-Based TestsParticipation WorkNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and book-based tests, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book, or .

QuizzesBook-Based TestsParticipation Work
“I have not had a test in this course; as the only .”
PYSC10G
“Appreciates her students! .”
FCS102
“The .”
CD12

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes and test-heavy tags, but comments do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, or .

QuizzesUnclear Exam Policy
“Gives out a lot of busy work but it's easy and she gives .”
PSYCH10G

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Take this class! You will work hard, but learn so much!”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 reviews, separating strong in-person support themes from weaker online organization concerns. Credibility rating: High.

❤️ Teaching Quality

92/100

“She's a and encourages your growth.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

89/100

“If you want to a great human development learning experience, this is the professor to spend time with!”

📚 Workload Reality

35/100

“This was a compact class that and participation!”

Theme 1

❤️ About Support

  • Takes the time to meet with students, is quick with emails, finds support systems for !
  • Professor Kennedy takes the time to understand that life happens, and offers flexibility to get work done.
  • Advocates for , and cares about the students.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Take this class! You will work hard, but learn so much!
  • Peer group participation matters (building relationship); and required to understand the in class work.
  • assigns tons of work last minute and expects us to finish everything within a short time frame??

Theme 3

🏫

  • do not miss a class because there are daily notes.
  • Show up to class because there is always new criteria to talk about.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The profile has 27 reviews with strong consistency in , but only 3 online reviews and older online comments reduce format confidence.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 523
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CD127 reviews
PSYCH10G7 reviews
FCS0706 reviews
FCS1023 reviews
PYSC10G3 reviews
Show 1 more courses
FCS701 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

27 reported outcomes

A range

20

A+ 3 · A 8 · A- 9

B range

7

B+ 6 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values