Is this an easy A?
HardWork
28/100Some students earned A grades, but comments show that , and .
Online reviews are harsher about grading inconsistency, while but include more older positive exceptions.
De Anza College · Child Development
CD68 · CD053 · CD54 · CD51A · CD50 · CD80 · CHDEVCD50 · CD52 · CD054 · CDCD63 · CD55 · CD51 · CD53 · MUSIC0031 · 43 lifetime ratings
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
Some students earned A grades, but comments show that grades require heavy work, unclear expectations, and strict grading.
Online reviews are harsher about grading inconsistency, while in-person reviews also report tough grading but include more older positive exceptions.
Is the course easy?
The subject matter is not always described as inherently hard, but unclear directions and workload make the courses feel difficult.
Both formats report confusion and workload, with online reviews especially focused on Canvas and unclear deadlines.
Is attendance flexible?
Many reviews mark attendance as mandatory or say participation matters, and some warn that skipping class hurts passing chances.
Both online and in-person reviews include mandatory attendance signals, while a few older records do not state the policy.
Is this professor recommended?
Most recent students do not recommend her because they describe unclear instructions, harsh grading, and stressful communication.
Online reviews are strongly avoidant, while in-person reviews are mixed but still contain repeated avoid warnings.
Course guide
Grading
Harsh
16/100
Students repeatedly call her a tough grader and say small mistakes, unclear rubrics, or subjective expectations cost major points.
Format shift
Online reviews emphasize inconsistent grading, while in-person reviews emphasize hard grading and low tolerance.
Workload
Overwhelming
18/100
Reviews repeatedly mention lots of homework, many papers, repeated assignments, and unnecessary busy work.
Format shift
Both formats show heavy workload, with online reviews adding time-consuming weekly assignments.
Teaching experience
Poor
25/100
The dominant pattern is disorganization, unclear instructions, and poor communication, despite a minority praising her care and knowledge.
Format shift
Online teaching complaints are more severe and recent, while in-person feedback includes older positive comments.
Assessment method
FocusOnAssignments
22/100
Student comments focus mainly on papers, projects, homework, rubrics, and assignment grading rather than exams.
Format shift
Both formats mainly describe assignment-based assessment.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner
In-person reviews are mixed historically but lean negative, especially on unclear assignments, heavy work, and tough grading.
Main concern
Students often say she is disorganized, unclear, and hard to satisfy.
What students said
“The ratings don't lie, if you can take this course at foothill do it!!!”
“Very hard grader, so many assignments, forget her own words, She gives useless mental stress.”
“Phyllis is a great teacher.”
Remote format
High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner
Online reviews are mostly negative, with repeated complaints about unclear Canvas directions, strict grading, and time-consuming assignments.
Main concern
Students say deadlines, rubrics, and grading expectations are unclear or inconsistent.
What students said
“Important assignments and deadlines were not always clearly communicated.”
“Inconsistend grader, she will extend all the deadlines for everything after you did the work, but then give 1/15 grade if she doesn't like the color of your presentation.”
“This professor is the WORST.”
Exam style
Reviews do not clearly prove a consistent exam policy, and most assessment evidence points to assignments and papers.
Assessment risk
Varies
45/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
In-person reviews mention test-heavy tags in some cases, but comments do not clearly prove exam format or proctoring rules.
“She gives unnecessary stress and is not clear about her assignment.”
“Instructions for assignments are given verbally and she forgets important parts.”
Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, midterm, or final policies.
“She does not tell you about upcoming tests/assignments YOU have to figure that out on your own!”
“Her expectations are unclear and she grades based on her own philosophys.”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“This professor is the WORST.”
“She's disorganized, inconsistent with grading, and gives unclear instructions.”
“She grades WAY TOO HARD.”
“Honestly, avoid all her class if possible! Worst teacher I have ever encountered!! First of all, she has way to many assignments and homework as a creative art class.”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
44
Recent reviews read by the AI
43
Lifetime ratings
92/100
Evidence confidence
The judgment is highly credible because it uses 44 reviews across online and in-person formats with repeated recent complaints.
Inside 44 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
24 reported outcomes
A 7 · A- 2
B+ 3 · B 1
C 2
No reported values
No reported values
Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 7