Is this an easy A?
EasyA
88/100An A is very realistic because grading is fair, is easy, and many students earned A grades, but attendance and notes still matter.
Online evidence points to easy , while attendance, participation, and notes.
De Anza College · Paralegal Studies
ADMJ3 · PARA75 · POLI013 · PARA65 · ADMJ61 · ADMJ75 · PARA90A · 16 lifetime ratings
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
An A is very realistic because grading is fair, extra credit is easy, and many students earned A grades, but attendance and notes still matter.
Online evidence points to easy extra credit, while in-person evidence more strongly ties high grades to attendance, participation, and notes.
Is the course easy?
Most students found the material straightforward and engaging, though some legal application questions and advanced evidence topics add real challenge.
Online reviews describe low to moderate difficulty, while in-person reviews show easy introductory courses mixed with a few harder legal application exams.
Is attendance flexible?
Online attendance appears optional, but several in-person reviews say attendance is required or important to pass.
Online reviews include optional attendance, while in-person reviews often emphasize mandatory attendance or the need to show up.
Is this professor recommended?
Students overwhelmingly recommend him because he is knowledgeable, caring, funny, and connects legal concepts to real practice.
Both online and in-person reviews are strongly positive, with online reviews adding a Canvas grade visibility complaint.
Course guide
Grading
Lenient
86/100
Grades appear generous because many reported A or A+ grades, extra credit is easy, and tests often allow open-book, open-note, or cheat-sheet support.
Format shift
Online reviews mention easy extra credit, while in-person reviews give stronger evidence of open-book or open-note grading support.
Workload
Light
82/100
Workload is light to moderate, with easy homework, manageable reading, notes, quizzes, a paper, and exams rather than heavy recurring assignments.
Format shift
Online workload evidence is limited but easy, while in-person reviews describe mostly manageable homework, reading, and exam preparation.
Teaching experience
Excellent
96/100
Students repeatedly praise his clarity, humor, patience, legal expertise, and care for students.
Format shift
Both formats rate his teaching highly, with in-person reviews giving more detailed support for engaging lectures and classroom presence.
Assessment method
Balanced
58/100
Assessments include homework, extra credit, quizzes, a paper, a midterm, and a final, so exams matter but do not seem to be the only grading basis.
Format shift
Online reviews mention midterm and final feedback issues, while in-person reviews describe quizzes, paper, midterm, final, and note-based exam preparation.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner
In-person reviews praise his engaging lectures, legal expertise, humor, and student support, with attendance and notes often mattering.
Main concern
Several in-person reviews say showing up, participating, and taking notes are important.
What students said
“Just show up to his class, pay attention and take notes.”
“Notes are extremely helpful for midterm and finals.”
“Open book tests and amusing lectures!”
Remote format
Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward
Online reviews are very positive about his knowledge and care, but students complain that grades are not posted clearly in Canvas.
Main concern
Grade visibility can be stressful because Canvas may not show current grades.
What students said
“Super easy!”
“he doesn't put anything into canvas so it can be stressing not seeing your grade”
“it was very stressing not to see your grade”
Exam style
Overall exam evidence is student-friendly because multiple in-person reviews mention open-book, open-note, or cheat-sheet formats, though one review says tests can still be difficult.
Assessment risk
StudentFriendly
88/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
In-person reviews strongly support open-book or open-note testing, with some exams still requiring applied knowledge.
“Open book tests and amusing lectures!”
“All open notes and open book.”
“Tests are difficult. He allows you to use a cheat sheet but wants to see application of knowledge.”
Online reviews mention midterm and final feedback, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, take-home, quiz format, or final format.
“when he gives back your midterm / final, he doesn't tell you what you missed or got right”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“Professor Bonini is very cool and his lectures are straightforward.”
“He cares about connecting with his students and if you are a serious ADMJ or PARA major then you will definitely find his classes enjoyable.”
“Would highly recommend him to anyone interested in the legal/law field.”
“Open note tests, half the quizzes aren't graded.”
“All open notes and open book.”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Theme 4
Data context
Analysis sample
16
Recent reviews read by the AI
16
Lifetime ratings
89/100
Evidence confidence
Credibility is high because 16 reviews span many years and show a consistent pattern of excellent teaching, fair grading, and manageable difficulty.
Inside 16 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
11 reported outcomes
A+ 4 · A 3 · A- 1
B+ 2 · B 1
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values