AI Rate Professor

English

Rebecca Board Liljenstolpe

ENGLISH1A · LING001 · EWRT1AHYBRID · ENGLISH1B · EWRT2 · LINGD001 · D010 · ELIT46C · ERWT1A · EWRT100B · ENG2 · EWRT1A · ELITD11 · ERWT2 · ELIT46B · ELIT46A · 109 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
63.08%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you want a caring, creative English professor and can tolerate uneven organization and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but inconsistentCreative writing focusReading heavySlow gradingTough on papers
  • Students often praise her care, creativity, and ability to make writing feel meaningful.
  • The main , and heavy reading or discussion work.
  • Grades are often high, but an A usually requires staying current and following writing expectations closely.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

73/100

Many students report As, but , and participation still matter.

Online evidence is more mixed and workload-heavy, while in-person evidence and effort.

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

The content is not usually conceptually extreme, but , and .

Online courses feel harder to self-manage, while and direct guidance.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

and some classes where attendance or participation is important.

Online reviews often mention optional or asynchronous work, while and class activities.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

67/100

Students recommend her for creativity and care, but the and .

In-person reviews are warmer overall, while online reviews and communication.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Grades are often high, but several students call her a tough or .

Format shift

Online reviews include more harsh-grading complaints, while and .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload commonly , and falling behind is a recurring risk.

Format shift

Online workload is more deadline- and discussion-heavy, while and class participation.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

, and inspiration, but negative reviews cite disorganization and poor responsiveness.

Format shift

In-person teaching is praised more for energy and storytelling, while online teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

, and projects rather than exam-heavy grading.

Format shift

Online courses lean on posts, essays, quizzes, and projects, while midterm and final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are more positive about her warmth, lectures, and writing help, but still mention messy structure and .

Main concern

Students may struggle when lectures ramble or .

What students said

“Easy if you just bring your journal and do the writing.”
ENGLISH1A
“The class structure is a MESS and her lectures don't help since she rambles.”
ELIT46B
“She inspired me to like writing again.”
EWRT2

Remote format

Online

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are polarized, with many students earning As but , and heavy reading or discussion work.

Main concern

Online students need to manage deadlines and ambiguity without relying on fast responses.

What students said

“ . Heavy on individuality especially .”
EWRT100B
“EASY A. Took this class as a GE, The but it's graded on completion!”
LING001
“ and always behind on work she needed to do.”
ERWT2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes, timed writing, and some midterm or final exams, but they do .

QuizzesTimed WritingMidterm And FinalOpen Book Quizzes MentionedProctoring Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

63/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and open-book quizzes, but do not show a single consistent exam style.

Midterm And FinalEasy QuizzesOpen Book QuizzesPolicy Varies
“Midterm and final. No paper.”
ELIT46C
“ and open book.”
EWRT2
“ if you do the reading.”
ERWT1A

Online

, and a final project, but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book exams.

QuizzesTimed WritingFinal ProjectProctoring Not Clearly Proven
“4 essays and 1 timed writing.”
ENGLISH1A
“ while but just search online and use common sense.”
LING001
“ but super easy if you just read and study.”
ENGLISH1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Fantastic professor! She was very clear what the expectations for the class would be early on.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting repeated themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“She inspired me to like writing again.”

⚖️

58/100

“ perfect score, but paying attention to her lectures, keeping up with the canvas module, and carefully following instructions will get you a high A.”

📚 Workload Pressure

45/100

“There is a lot of discussions and readings assigned.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She taught me how to break bad habits and showed all of us how to become more imaginative, interesting storytellers.
  • She's an amazing storyteller and got me interested in medieval history.
  • and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • EASY A. Took this class as a GE, The but it's graded on completion!
  • .
  • She gives lots of , though she's not really a .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support And Communication

  • and her in class assignments are much more simpler than you would think.
  • She was very clear what the expectations for the class would be early on.
  • I never got an , but the class was overall interesting and easy.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

109

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The judgment is based on 50 reviews across many years and both formats, with , and organization.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 557
4 out of 519
3 out of 514
2 out of 59
1 out of 510

Course coverage

ERWT1A8 reviews
ERWT27 reviews
ENGLISH1A5 reviews
ENGLISH1B5 reviews
EWRT24 reviews
Show 11 more courses
ELIT46C3 reviews
ELITD113 reviews
ENG23 reviews
EWRT100B3 reviews
EWRT1A3 reviews
D0101 review
ELIT46A1 review
ELIT46B1 review
EWRT1AHYBRID1 review
LING0011 review
LINGD0011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

45 reported outcomes

A range

32

A+ 3 · A 21 · A- 8

B range

4

B+ 3 · B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 1