AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Asian American Studies

Nina E. Moskowitz

ASAM11 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
89/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take her online if and , but expect steady writing assignments.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear rubricsCaring instructorWriting-heavyExtra creditOnline friendly
  • Students describe a and .
  • Grades are attainable, but success depends on following rubrics and completing regular writing work.
  • Evidence is promising but limited because there are only four online reviews and no in-person reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

High grades are realistic because rubrics are clear and exists, but .

All evidence comes from online reviews; there is no in-person evidence.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

The class is easy to navigate, but regular readings, discussion posts, and .

All evidence comes from online reviews; there is no in-person evidence.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

95/100

as not mandatory.

All evidence comes from online reviews; there is no in-person evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

Students mostly recommend her because she is caring, clear, and and workload.

All recommendation evidence is online, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Clear rubrics and make grades attainable, though .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The , and major projects, but students describe it as manageable.

Format shift

Only online workload evidence is available.

Teaching experience

Excellent

87/100

Students describe her as , and .

Format shift

Only online teaching evidence is available.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

10/100

Assessment appears centered , and projects rather than exams.

Format shift

Only online assessment evidence is available.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online reviews describe a , and manageable expectations.

Main concern

Weekly writing and .

What students said

“ so easy to succeed as long as you pay attention to the rubric.”
ASAM11
“she does grade a , but nothing crazy.”
ASAM11

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews discuss papers, projects, and discussion posts, but do .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great prof! so easy to succeed as long as you pay attention to the rubric.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting teaching, grading, workload, and limited format coverage. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

87/100

“She genuinely cares about each student and wants them to learn about the material.”

📈 Easy A Path

78/100

“ so easy to succeed as long as you pay attention to the rubric.”

📝 Workload

55/100

“Only a couple discussion posts per week w/ 3 big projects in the quarter.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She genuinely cares about each student and wants them to learn about the material.
  • She is very open to .
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

  • so easy to succeed as long as you pay attention to the rubric.
  • she does grade a , but nothing crazy.
  • Hosts office hours every week for , so it's ok to miss a couple assignments.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • One small writing assignment (200-250) due Thursday, and a large writing assignment due Saturday (350-500).
  • Only a couple discussion posts per week w/ 3 big projects in the quarter.
  • It's not as much reading as it seems, but it is a bit to mine quotes.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

The reviews are recent and detailed but limited to only four online comments with no in-person evidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ASAM114 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values