AI Rate Professor

English

Marrietta Reber

EWRT1B · ENG1B · EWRT2 · EWRT001A · 1B · EWRT1A · 118 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
70.37%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want to become a better writer and , and strict expectations.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy Reading LoadDetailed Essay FeedbackClear RubricsCaring but StrictExtra Credit Available
  • , and care, especially for improving writing.
  • The main drawback is a and writing load that can overwhelm busy students.
  • Grades are possible with effort, but and frequent quizzes or assignments.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is realistic because many students earned one and appears often, but reviews repeatedly say the , and consistency.

Online and in-person reviews both show A outcomes, but and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The writing concepts are manageable, but the course becomes difficult because of , and participation work.

Online reviews stress workload pacing, while , and strict expectations.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Some reviews say attendance is not mandatory, but as mandatory or say participation matters.

, while in-person evidence is mixed and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and growth, but negative reviews warn that the workload can be too much.

Both formats include strong praise and strong warnings, with online reviews showing more extreme negative workload complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Grading is usually described as tough but rubric-based, with and .

Format shift

Online reviews include both lenient essay grading and tough workload complaints, while but demanding.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Many reviews mention lots of reading, weekly quizzes, discussions, journals, essays, and .

Format shift

Both formats report heavy work, but online reviews more often describe the weekly load as overwhelming.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Students often describe her as , and helpful, though some call her strict, stressful, or unsympathetic.

Format shift

Online praise focuses on organization and feedback, while , and writing improvement.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Assessment appears , and quizzes rather than major exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention discussions and timed quizzes, while , and weekly quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

28 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and clear rubrics, but also frequent reading, participation, and strict grading.

Main concern

Students who are busy or weak at writing may struggle with the reading volume and .

What students said

“SHE IS A AND ASSIGNS A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF WORK.”
EWRT2
“The .”
EWRT2
“Do the work and you will do well, I learned a lot and improved tremendously,”
EWRT1A

Remote format

Online

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews and complaints about extreme reading, timed quizzes, and heavy weekly work.

Main concern

The online workload can , and essays stack up each week.

What students said

“This class has the benefits of an asynchronous course but the professor structured it so well and I was very engaged in the content.”
EWRT2
“She assigns 110 to 170 pages of .”
EWRT2
“Taking a 5 minute timed quiz based on weekly readings is what might bring my grade down.”
EWRT2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mainly describe quizzes and essays, but they do not clearly prove webcam rules, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, or closed-book exams.

Weekly QuizzesTimed QuizzesEssaysMidterm EssayFinal EssayPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and participation, but do not clearly prove closed-book exams or strict proctoring.

Weekly QuizzesEssaysMidterm EssayFinal EssayPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“Weekly quizzes with sometimes 6+ readings to do.”
EWRT2
“1 quiz, 1 journal and 2 responses to others' journal are all of the mid-term and final.”
EWRT1A
“ , and replies are all due on Monday 11:59pm.”
EWRT2

Online

Online , and essays, but do not clearly prove webcam rules, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book exams.

Weekly QuizzesTimed QuizzesEssaysPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“Gibe you 5 minutes for weekly quizzes”
EWRT2
“Taking a 5 minute timed quiz based on weekly readings is what might bring my grade down.”
EWRT2
“There are only three major essays, timed quizzes, journals, and .”
ENG1B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“SHE IS A AND ASSIGNS A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF WORK. But you will learn SO MUCH and genuinely become a better writer.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“She gives amazing feedback on papers, I definitely improved my writing because of her.”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“She assigns 110 to 170 pages of .”

⚖️

48/100

“The .”

👍 Recommendation Level

72/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Ms. Reber is a great online course instructor.
  • Professor Reber cares about her students and is very pationate about teaching.
  • and if I was confused she straightened it out right away.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • This class makes you work very hard for an A.
  • Follow her instructions and you can earn an A.
  • , so don't expect , but it's still reasonable.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • her students have.
  • There was a LOT of reading though, so if you're taking lots of other classes or have a job, be wary of that.
  • High workload, but manageable.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

118

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 50 reviews across online and in-person formats from 2016 to 2025, with , and care.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 558
4 out of 519
3 out of 517
2 out of 512
1 out of 512

Course coverage

EWRT229 reviews
EWRT1A13 reviews
EWRT001A4 reviews
EWRT1B2 reviews
1B1 review
Show 1 more courses
ENG1B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

36 reported outcomes

A range

22

A+ 2 · A 13 · A- 7

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

10

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 6 · Rather not say 1