AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Child Development & Education

Jayanti Tambe

PSYCH10G · CD51A · PYSC10G · CD62 · CD50 · CD12 · CD52 · CD61 · CD63 · CD51B · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
78.26%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a supportive teacher and can attend regularly.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear and caring teacherHands-on lecturesHelpful feedbackMostly easy gradesMandatory attendance
  • Most students praise her as , and deeply experienced in child development.
  • Grades are usually attainable, but attendance and .
  • Online reviews are much weaker because students report and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

83/100

An A is very reachable if , and , though it is not effortless in every course.

The Easy A evidence is much stronger in person, while .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The content is usually made beginner-friendly through examples and activities, but some courses still require steady participation.

In-person reviews describe clearer and easier learning, while online reviews describe more difficulty from workload and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as .

, and most in-person reviews also treat attendance as required.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

84/100

and clear explanations, despite several strong complaints about grading and communication.

, while online evidence is split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Many students report A , and , but a few describe unfair deductions.

Format shift

, while online reviews do not clearly prove grading leniency.

Workload

Moderate

63/100

In-person workload is often light, but online students repeatedly mention lots of homework.

Format shift

Online workload appears heavier, while as manageable.

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

Most students describe her as , and memorable, with a few older negative reviews about unclear instructions.

Format shift

, while online feedback is mixed because of communication and homework concerns.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Reviews , and exams rather than one dominant assessment type.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide the clearest assessment evidence, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

explanations, caring support, and active class activities.

Main concern

and a few students report inconsistent grading.

What students said

“she makes it simple for her students to understand and includes stories.”
CD50
“She does not give a lot of learned from.”
CD12

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online feedback is mixed, with one strong praise for caring teaching and .

Main concern

Students may face lots of homework and .

What students said

“ .”
CD62
“Also, ready for lots of Homework!”
CD52

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The notes and lectures, with no clear proof of open-book or strict proctoring.

Multiple Choice ExamsShort EssayTests Based On Notes And Lectures

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

essay, and tests that match notes and lectures.

Multiple Choice ExamsShort EssayTests Based On Notes And Lectures
“ .”
PSYCH10G
“ as long as you review notes and attend lectures.”
PYSC10G

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and will help with whatever she can I have taken 3 of her classes and have passed all of them with an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“She broke it down and made everything so clear and less scary.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

84/100

“ !”

📈 Easy A Potential

83/100

“all you really need to do to get an A is , and turn them in on time.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She made the concepts of child development easy to understand, giving plenty of examples to help you understand the concepts.
  • she makes it simple for her students to understand and includes stories.
  • Every class was amazing.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • She is a , and there isnt too much work or reading for this class.
  • Offers !
  • She does not give a lot of learned from.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • .
  • She grades very different to her rubrics
  • and is judgmental when students try to ask questions.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is based on 25 reviews across many years, with detailed and mostly consistent comments but only two online reviews.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CD616 reviews
CD124 reviews
CD51A3 reviews
PYSC10G3 reviews
CD502 reviews
Show 5 more courses
CD51B2 reviews
CD632 reviews
CD521 review
CD621 review
PSYCH10G1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 1 · A 9 · A- 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 4