AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Joshua Avera

PSY008 · PSYC14 · PSYC008 · PSY001 · PSYC1 · PSYCD001 · PSY225 · PSYCH1 · PSYC02122 · PSYC100 · PSYCH14 · PSYC32951 · PSYCH01 · PSYC001 · 177 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
81.94%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want an engaging psychology class and are willing to keep up with , and lecture notes.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging lecturesFunny and passionateReading-heavy workloadLecture-based testsSlow grading and replies
  • Most students praise Avera as engaging, funny, and knowledgeable, especially in .
  • Grades are usually attainable, but students , and lecture-based exams.
  • Online reviews are more mixed because students report , and more self-teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

73/100

An A is very possible, but students , and lecture-based studying.

Online evidence is more divided, while manageable if students attend and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The psychology content is usually introductory and clear, but the and fast or .

Online students mention more self-teaching and textbook reliance, while material understandable.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

Attendance ranges from optional to effectively necessary because .

Online reviews include several optional lecture comments, while test performance.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

and passion, though because of workload, disorganization, or slow communication.

In-person recommendations are stronger, while online and email issues.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Grades are often high and students mention or clear criteria, but papers and .

Format shift

Online reviews include both easy A comments and heavy workload complaints, while as fair if students attend and study.

Workload

Moderate

43/100

The workload is not usually conceptually hard, but repeated readings, textbook quizzes, homework, papers, and .

Format shift

Online reviews report more tedious textbook and assignment load, while and test preparation.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Students consistently praise his humor, passion, and engaging lectures, but online students report weak responsiveness and .

Format shift

, while online feedback is more mixed because communication and organization matter more.

Assessment method

Balanced

63/100

Assessment appears to mix textbook homework, quizzes, papers, participation, unit tests, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention textbook quizzes and homework more, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students mostly describe strong, funny, useful lectures with tests tied closely to class notes.

Main concern

Students often need to attend and pay attention because .

What students said

“well taught class for Gen Psych, lectures are amazing, insightful, caring and ”
PSY001
“You must attend class in order to do well on tests, but if you pay attention and ”
PSYC1
“His class is extremely lecture heavy.”
PSYC001

Remote format

Online

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students often still like his lectures, but they report more , and occasional self-teaching.

Main concern

Online students may need to manage the workload and .

What students said

“The work can be very very time consuming, so used that info to your advantage.”
PSY001
“ and he never responded to any of my emails”
PSYC1
“all-in-all the class is an easy A / A- if you try!”
PSYC001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe mostly lecture- and textbook-based exams, often straightforward with preparation, but .

Lecture-Based ExamsTextbook QuizzesFrequent TestsFinal ExamOpen Note Chapter Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and sometimes frequent tests, with one review clearly saying Canvas chapter exams were open note.

Lecture-Based TestsFrequent Multiple Choice ExamsOpen Note Chapter Exams
“He uses M-H Connect for textbook assignments and .”
PSYC001
“There are 6 mult choice exams every 2 weeks and so be there and !”
PSYC14
“I appreciate how everything he lectures is on the exams.”
PSYCH14

Online

Online reviews mention reading quizzes, exams after chapters, a final exam, and policy.

Reading QuizzesChapter ExamsFinal ExamNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“The workload for this class is reasonable but expect lots of reading each week and a .”
PSYCD001
“we had to take an exam after 2 chapters. The final exam only tested on the last 2 chapters.”
PSYC008
“ and textbook.”
PSYC001

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting recurring themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“His lectures were thorough, and he presented them in an entertaining and engaging way.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

82/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Reality

43/100

“The work can be very very time consuming, so used that info to your advantage.”

⚖️ Grade Effort

73/100

“all-in-all the class is an easy A / A- if you try!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Avera is a great professor in psychology and knows so much information.
  • His lectures were really engaging and funny, and .
  • The lectures were always humorous and informative, and Mr. Avera provides very applicable real-life examples of the material we are taught.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • If you put even a .
  • Not an easy A, and not really an easy B either.
  • and if you study, you'll get an A.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload and Organization

  • There is definitely a lot of homework but it isn't too hard to get an A.
  • The professor makes you work for your grade and made this summer kind of a bad one with .
  • He , and class was canceled often, he would forget to open stuff on canvas

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

177

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 50 reviews from 2018 to 2025 with consistent themes across grades, formats, and courses.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5110
4 out of 542
3 out of 517
2 out of 54
1 out of 54

Course coverage

PSYC00116 reviews
PSY00112 reviews
PSYC14 reviews
PSYCD0014 reviews
PSYCH013 reviews
Show 9 more courses
PSYCH12 reviews
PSYCH142 reviews
PSY0081 review
PSY2251 review
PSYC0081 review
PSYC021221 review
PSYC1001 review
PSYC141 review
PSYC329511 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

43 reported outcomes

A range

27

A+ 3 · A 19 · A- 5

B range

7

B+ 3 · B 4

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

8

Incomplete 3 · Not sure yet 5