AI Rate Professor

English

Julie Sartwell

LART211 · ENG1A · READD200 · D001A · EWRT100 · EWRT · ELIT10 · EWRIT1A · ELIT39 · EWRT1S · EWRT1A · LART200 · 92 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
77.14%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if and can keep up with readings, essays, and participation.

Best fit · Effort For RewardDetailed FeedbackCaring but DemandingParticipation MattersReading and EssaysPicky Grader
  • Students , and ability to improve writing.
  • The course is usually manageable, but , and participation matter.
  • many students earn A-range grades, but several call her picky or tough.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

A grades are common, but students repeatedly say , and follow directions.

Online evidence says it is not an easy A, while if you do the work.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The content is usually intro-level and clearly taught, but the reading and .

Both formats describe manageable writing courses, but in-person reviews give stronger evidence of beginner-friendly teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

as mandatory, and participation is repeatedly tied to passing and doing well.

Online reviews mention attendance and camera participation, while and joining discussion.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

Most students recommend her because she is caring and and grading.

, while online reviews are too few and more mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

She can be picky or tough on essays, but , and feedback make grades feel achievable for many students.

Format shift

Online reviews include one tough-grading complaint, while grading and fair support.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload , and participation, with some students calling it a lot but not overwhelming.

Format shift

Online reviews mention lots of homework and papers, while as steady but manageable.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

, and support, though a minority describe her as impatient, rude, or unclear.

Format shift

In-person evidence is much stronger and more positive, while online evidence is limited and mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades appear , and presentations rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize writing and participation, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

47 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, care, and writing improvement, but workload and grading can feel demanding.

Main concern

Students who skip, avoid participation, or procrastinate may struggle.

What students said

“She gives a lot of and handouts that help improve your writing skills.”
EWRIT1A
“Professor Sartwell is a , and can be very direct during lectures.”
EWRT1A
“As long as you actually read and do the work you'll be fine”
D001A

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed, with two positive experiences and and .

Main concern

Online students may need to participate visibly and and writing.

What students said

“Shes a great professor. Loves participation and having camera on.”
EWRT1A
“Not an "easy A" but what writing class is?”
ENG1A
“she's a and .”
EWRT

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , and and participation.

Limited Exam EvidenceEssaysGroup PresentationMidterm and Final MentionedTake-Home Essay Mentioned

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, group presentation, and demanding exams in some literature courses.

Midterm and Final MentionedTake-Home EssayGroup PresentationDemanding Exams Mentioned
“Midterm and essay and a group presentation that is graded fairly easily.”
ELIT10
“But and she expects way too much off you.”
ELIT39

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam proctoring, open-book exams, Lockdown Browser, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and understanding, and as long as you follow along and do the work an A is easily achievable.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“She gives a lot of and handouts that help improve your writing skills.”

📈 Grade Effort

72/100

“As long as you actually read and do the work you'll be fine”

⚖️

55/100

“She has a specific way she likes her students to write her papers and outside that she will grade harsher.”

👍 Recommendation

80/100

“I can't say a single bad thing about her and really loved having her as a professor.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • caring, friendly, dedicated teacher; ; gives a lot of
  • Before taking her class, I , but now I can confidently say I know how to write one.
  • She walks you through everything.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • it's an 8-unit course, so be prepared to have a lot of work to do
  • and writing but never overwhelming.
  • There is a lot of reading and writing, which can be a bit overwhelming if you procrastinate like me

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • Not an "easy A" but what writing class is?
  • as long as you follow along and do the work an A is easily achievable.
  • She is an amazing professor u can even talk to outside of class. You need to work a little for that grade but def not impossible to get an A.

Theme 4

⚠️ About Concerns

  • Professor Sartwell is a , and can be very direct during lectures.
  • she's a and .
  • She is super rude!!!!! And so

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

92

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 50 reviews across many years, with detailed and mostly consistent themes despite some older polarized comments.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 543
4 out of 526
3 out of 511
2 out of 54
1 out of 58

Course coverage

EWRT1A22 reviews
EWRIT1A9 reviews
ELIT104 reviews
LART2114 reviews
D001A3 reviews
Show 7 more courses
LART2002 reviews
ELIT391 review
ENG1A1 review
EWRT1 review
EWRT1001 review
EWRT1S1 review
READD2001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

35 reported outcomes

A range

24

A+ 5 · A 15 · A- 4

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

7

Audit/No Grade 2 · Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 3