AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Sandra Li

ACCTD001B · ACCT1B · ACCT1A · 64 lifetime ratings

AI rating
95/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
85.94%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you want a , but avoid asynchronous online sections if you need live teaching.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra Credit HeavyClear GradingCaring And AccessibleStrong In-Person TeachingAsync Self-Study Risk
  • Most students , and .
  • Getting an A is very realistic, but students still need to keep up with homework and review work.
  • Online synchronous and , where several students felt left on their own.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

91/100

because , and clear test preparation make an A highly reachable if students complete the work.

Both formats support an easy-A pattern, but online .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Accounting is not effortless, but Li often makes the , and structured assignments.

In-person and synchronous online reviews describe clearer learning, while asynchronous online reviews make the course feel harder.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

64/100

Many reviews , but several online sections list attendance as .

Online attendance evidence is mixed, while .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Most students recommend her because , and gives many chances to succeed.

, while online reviews are split mainly by synchronous versus asynchronous format.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

93/100

is repeatedly described as large enough to boost grades, and several students say an A is hard to miss if .

Format shift

, though asynchronous online students still report more learning friction.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The workload includes regular Cengage homework, projects, midterms, a final, and that helps grades but takes time.

Format shift

Online reviews more often mention long Cengage work, while but steady.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

and care, but asynchronous online sections create a real teaching-quality gap.

Format shift

In-person teaching is consistently praised, while online quality depends heavily on whether lectures are actually provided.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Grades , and a final rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

, and finals, with online reviews adding more Cengage-based work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are very strong, with students praising clear explanations, caring support, and .

Main concern

The class and .

What students said

“If all the review assignments are completed, it is impossible to not get an A in her class.”
ACCT1B
“ and .”
ACCT1A
“It will be work, but you will learn a lot.”
ACCT1A

Remote format

Online

28 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are positive overall, especially for synchronous sections, but asynchronous sections draw repeated complaints about missing lectures and self-study.

Main concern

Asynchronous students may need to learn mostly from the textbook and homework.

What students said

“For asynchronous, she doesn't post lectures (which is unfortunate because she teaches really well) so you're on your own.”
ACCT1B
“ as long as and follow the lectures.”
ACCT1A
“she gives so much it's difficult NOT to get an A.”
ACCT1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are usually described as fair and manageable with preparation, but reviews .

Midterms And FinalDropped Lowest MidtermFair ExamsCheat Sheets MentionedHomework-Aligned Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention cheat sheets, homework-aligned tests, midterms, and a final, but they do .

Cheat Sheets MentionedHomework-Aligned TestsMidterms And Final
“There are cheat sheets for exams so you don't feel so pressured.”
ACCT1B
“There are 2 assignments per week, 2 midterms, and a final.”
ACCT1A
“the .”
ACCT1A

Online

, and fair tests, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policies.

Midterms And FinalDropped Lowest MidtermFair Exams
“There were 3 midterms but .”
ACCT1A
“The and not too hard if you follow along.”
ACCT1B
“The last 3 midterms were so hard”
ACCT1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Best professor that I've ever met in my life! and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“ and .”

💯 Easy A Potential

91/100

“As long as you do the homework and it should be impossible to get anything lower than an A.”

⚠️ Online Format Risk

64/100

“For asynchronous, she doesn't post lectures (which is unfortunate because she teaches really well) so you're on your own.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and engaging, and she offers plenty of EC opportunities, making it easier to get an A if you put in the effort.
  • Professor Li makes an inherently difficult and unintuitive subject like accounting easy to understand with .
  • Her lectures are engaging and easy to understand from a beginner's standpoint.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Workload

  • If all the review assignments are completed, it is impossible to not get an A in her class.
  • so so so so so and it's annoying to do but the .
  • It will be work, but you will learn a lot.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Sections

  • .
  • she only posts lectures for her zoom classes so if .
  • if this course is online.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

64

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 recent reviews across both formats show detailed and mostly consistent patterns, with .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 551
4 out of 52
3 out of 54
2 out of 55
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ACCT1A32 reviews
ACCT1B17 reviews
ACCTD001B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

48 reported outcomes

A range

38

A+ 18 · A 17 · A- 3

B range

6

B+ 2 · B 4

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3