AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Nursing

Khalil Kholoud

Courses not reported · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you want serious nursing instruction and are ready to prepare before class and study heavily.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerRespected ICU expertLecture heavyLots of homeworkRequires preparation
  • The only review strongly respects Khalil's expertise and recommends the class.
  • Getting an A appears possible, but only with , and practice questions.
  • Credibility is limited because there is only one online review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

The student earned an A, but the grade.

All evidence comes from one online review, with no in-person evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The content appears demanding because students are told to master PowerPoints, textbook material, EKGs, and practice questions.

All course difficulty evidence comes from one online review.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

The as mandatory and tells students to pay attention in class.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

The only student recommends her strongly because she is respected and clearly treated as an expert.

Recommendation evidence comes only from one online review, so confidence is limited.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

The review reports an A but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

The review explicitly lists lots of notes, textbook reading, videos before class, and practice questions.

Format shift

All workload evidence comes from one online review.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

The review strongly respects her expertise, but one review is not enough to confirm a broad pattern.

Format shift

All teaching evidence comes from one online review.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review mentions preparation and practice questions but does not clearly prove the assessment mix.

Format shift

All assessment evidence comes from one online review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single online review praises her ICU expertise but describes a demanding lecture-heavy class requiring major preparation.

Main concern

The class , and practice questions.

What students said

Pay attention in class and .
95
You should also read the textbook a bit to get a better understanding.
95
Do practice questions!!!
95

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the , webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring policy.

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

The online review does not clearly prove the , webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring policy.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

Dr. Khalil is the queen of the ICU.

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in expertise, workload, and preparation. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

Dr. Khalil is the queen of the ICU.

📚 Workload Demand

28/100

Pay attention in class and .

📈 Grade Effort

58/100

Do practice questions!!!

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Expertise

  • Dr. Khalil is the queen of the ICU.
  • Pay attention in class and .

Theme 2

📚 About Preparation

  • and understand EKG's for example, and how to read them before coming to class.
  • You should also read the textbook a bit to get a better understanding.
  • Do practice questions!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

30/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one review, one course, and one format despite the review being specific.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

951 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values