AI Rate Professor

English

Adam Sandel

ENG1A · D001A · ELIT22 · EWRT1B · ENG1B · EWRT2 · ELIT17 · 1A · ERWT1A · ELIT10 · D002A · EWRT1A · 121 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
62.79%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Sandel is a good fit if you can keep up with reading and writing, but .

Best fit · Effort For RewardReading and writing heavyFeedback variesClear structureTough graderNo exams focus
  • Most older and some , and writing growth.
  • Recent online EWRT and ELIT reviews raise serious concerns , and .
  • The course is usually manageable for students who read carefully, write consistently, and follow the syllabus closely.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

Many students earn A grades, but , and careful attention to instructions.

Online evidence is more mixed because recent reviews report strict grading, while good grades.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

The content is usually accessible, but frequent reading and .

Online sections can be straightforward when organized, while and regular written responses.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

Many online classes are asynchronous or optional, while as important or mandatory.

Online attendance is often optional, but in-person .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

He is recommended for structured writing growth, but and .

, while online reviews have sharper recent negative warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Some students call the and fair, but recent reviews describe picky grading, vague criteria, and .

Format shift

Online grading complaints are stronger in recent reviews, while warnings.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The workload is steady with readings, short responses, essays, and papers, but many students say it is manageable with planning.

Format shift

Online workload is mostly readings and written submissions, while and class discussion.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Many students praise his structure, readings, and writing support, though .

Format shift

Online teaching quality is split, while and writing improvement.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

, and written assignments rather than tests.

Format shift

Both formats focus on writing assignments, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are more positive overall, emphasizing , and .

Main concern

, and frequent writing are the main demands.

What students said

“ ”
EWRT2
“ , but it isn't too much.”
EWRT1A
“ ; A is rare.”
EWRT1B

Remote format

Online

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online and recent complaints about vague prompts, strict grading, and weak feedback.

Main concern

Recent and less useful feedback.

What students said

“This and well paced”
ERWT1A
“ to bad scores”
D002A
“Teacher doesn't give feedback and .”
EWRT2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews show an assignment-heavy writing course with and .

No TestsNo QuizzesEssay BasedFinal Essay

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

in one section and mostly describe essays, responses, and discussions.

No TestsNo QuizzesEssaysClass Discussion
“ ! ”
ERWT1A
“Sandel requires students to turn-in 1-2-page essays discussing the .”
EWRT1B
“Hw is due every class, about 1-2 pages response to the .”
EWRT1A

Online

Online reviews emphasize essays and written assignments, and do not clearly .

EssaysWritten AssignmentsFinal Essay
“2 4-page essays (3rd essay optional) and the final is a 6-page essay.”
EWRT1A
“A 2-page essay weekly”
ELIT10
“ . That's it.”
EWRT2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do the work and you'll pass with an A!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Sandel's personality comes through in the recorded lectures, and his encouraging comments on my essays helped me to become a much better writer.”

📚 Workload

48/100

“40-60 pages of reading a week on top of 3-4 pages of written response due”

⚖️

55/100

“If it isn't perfect, it's a 4/5 score.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This professor really knows his stuff and his lectures are very insightful
  • Loved this class! Teacher is very clear, assignments are graded at a reasonable time.
  • Lectures were seven minutes of him repeating his own vague instructions.

Theme 2

✍️ About Writing and Feedback

  • and very straightforward.
  • Teacher doesn't give feedback and .

Theme 3

📈 About Workload and Grades

  • Pretty easy class with a maximum of 2 written assignments per week.
  • Just read the materials and put some effort into the writing assignments and essays, and you should get a good grade
  • ; A is rare.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

121

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 50 reviews across online and a possible shift in online experience.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 568
4 out of 526
3 out of 511
2 out of 54
1 out of 513

Course coverage

EWRT217 reviews
EWRT1A9 reviews
EWRT1B5 reviews
ERWT1A4 reviews
D002A3 reviews
Show 7 more courses
ELIT223 reviews
1A2 reviews
D001A2 reviews
ENG1A2 reviews
ELIT101 review
ELIT171 review
ENG1B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

42 reported outcomes

A range

29

A 24 · A- 5

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 5