AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Kamau Birago

SOC20 · SOC1 · SOC001 · SOCIO1 · D001 · SOC005 · SOCIOLOGY · SOC101 · SOCD001 · INTL8 · SOC15 · 72 lifetime ratings

AI rating
23/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid unless you strongly want a demanding sociology class and can , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHeavy ReadingUnclear GradingStrict AttendanceDisorganized Online Class
  • Recent online reviews are , and unclear grades.
  • Students repeatedly describe heavy reading, frequent reflections, and .
  • A smaller group values his knowledge and discussion style, but the overall recommendation signal is weak.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

27/100

Getting an A , and tolerance for strict or unclear grading.

Online reviews are harsher about workflow and grading, while and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Intro-level content is often , and unclear expectations.

Online difficulty is inflated by course management problems, while , and participation.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

24/100

, and some describe strict behavior around class presence.

Online attendance varies by review, but participation.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

31/100

Most recent and detailed reviews warn against taking him because of , and poor organization.

Online reviews are especially negative, while but still many warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students repeatedly call him a tough or , and several report low grades, withdrawals, or no grade visibility.

Format shift

Online reviews stress no and locked grades, while in-person reviews stress exams and .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

The class commonly requires frequent , and exam study.

Format shift

Online reviews mention daily or weekly assignments, while and participation.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Some students praise his knowledge, but , and disorganized class management.

Format shift

Online teaching complaints center on Canvas and communication, while and classroom tone.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

76/100

, and grades based on few major items.

Format shift

Online reviews include readings, reflections, midterms, and finals, while and participation-heavy grading.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed but lean negative, with repeated complaints , and an intimidating style.

Main concern

Attendance, participation, and .

What students said

“ and you won't know your grade in the class until the quarter ends.”
SOC001
“IF YOU VALUE .”
SOC001
“ and I really like the way he organizes his notes.”
SOC001

Remote format

Online

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative because students report , and unclear grades.

Main concern

Online structure and .

What students said

“doesn't , so you have to turn in .”
SOC001
“no clarity on grades throughout the .”
D001
“ if you want an easy A.”
SOC001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is high because , and grades based on few assessments, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring rules.

Lecture-Based ExamsStrict DeadlinesGrade Based On Few ThingsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and grades based on exams, but they do not clearly prove closed-book or .

Lecture-Based ExamsExam-Heavy GradingNo Clear Book Policy Evidence
“ and you won't know your grade in the class until the quarter ends.”
SOC001
“Most of ”
SOC001

Online

Online reviews mention tests, midterms, finals, and strict deadlines, but they do not clearly .

Strict DeadlinesMidterms And FinalNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“Strict 5 PM deadlines and Tests due by 9 PM”
D001
“2 Midterms and 1 Finals.”
SOC001

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! lectures are dull, contradictory, no clarity on grades throughout the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“ and did not answer any of our questions.”

⚖️

22/100

“This professor is a .”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“You have to submit 4 R/Rs (reading reflection) every week until Wk.11.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures are dull, contradictory, no clarity on grades throughout the course
  • and I really like the way he organizes his notes.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • if you want an easy A.
  • and you won't know your grade in the class until the quarter ends.
  • Class avg on every exam was a C for an INTRO course

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • doesn't , so you have to turn in .
  • The difficult to access and complete.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

72

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The evidence is strong because 50 reviews span many years, both formats, and , and teaching style.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 510
3 out of 512
2 out of 514
1 out of 520

Course coverage

SOC00123 reviews
SOC110 reviews
D0014 reviews
SOC0053 reviews
SOC203 reviews
Show 6 more courses
SOCIOLOGY2 reviews
INTL81 review
SOC1011 review
SOC151 review
SOCD0011 review
SOCIO11 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

35 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 3 · A- 2

B range

9

B+ 1 · B 6 · B- 2

C range

4

C+ 2 · C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

16

Drop/Withdrawal 7 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 6 · Rather not say 2