AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Asian Studies

So Lee

ASAM40 · D0026 · SP21 · ARTS2G · ASAMD040 · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
15/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
12%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid unless you need the course and can , and a large workload.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy workloadTough gradingDisorganized lecturesSelf-teaching requiredOccasional leniency
  • , and weekly assignments.
  • Grading is often seen as strict or .
  • Online reviews are especially negative about weak lecture materials and busywork.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Some students earn A , but most comments say the workload and grading make the A costly.

Online evidence is harsher about grading and workload, while .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The course content is not always conceptually hard, but , and poor structure make it feel difficult.

Online students emphasize weak self-study materials, while and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

marked mandatory and most online classes marked not mandatory.

Online , while in-person reviews are split between mandatory and optional.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students do not recommend her because they , and .

Both formats lean negative, but online reviews are more consistently severe.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

18/100

Students repeatedly say she rarely gives full credit and .

Format shift

Online reviews are strongly strict-grading focused, while .

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

Many reviews describe excessive readings, papers, discussions, videos, quizzes, and weekly deadlines.

Format shift

Online reviews are especially workload-heavy, and in-person summer or art reviews also report intense assignment loads.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Students often describe her as nice but , and ineffective online.

Format shift

Online reviews criticize missing or weak lectures, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Grades appear , and quizzes, with some tests.

Format shift

Online reviews mention discussions, videos, and papers more, while and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed but still lean negative, with , and too much homework.

Main concern

In-person students often say the class takes much more work than expected.

What students said

“ .”
ASAM40
“Just stay away.”
ARTS2G
“Plenty of opportunities.”
ASAMD040

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students mostly report , and little direct teaching.

Main concern

Online reviews repeatedly say the workload is too high and the teaching materials are unhelpful.

What students said

“TOO MUCH WORK. If you have other classes or a .”
ASAM40
“Insane amount of work.”
ASAMD040
“Prepare to teach yourself. !”
ASAM40

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and open-internet tests but and test-heavy complaints.

Open Book TestsOpen Internet TestsWeekly QuizzesMultiple Choice TestsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and challenging quizzes, but do not clearly prove proctoring or closed-book exams.

Open Book TestsMultiple Choice TestsWeekly Quizzes
“ though, all multiple choice and open book, with lots of time to search the textbook, and we even got 2 attempts.”
ARTS2G
“ note and shes a .”
ARTS2G

Online

Online reviews mention open-book or open-internet tests in one review, but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring.

Open Book TestsOpen Internet TestsHard Tests Without Book
“ , but filling out the provided SG w/ the .”
ARTS2G
“Just know that .”
ARTS2G

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Honestly, this professor and teaching style is the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“Prepare to teach yourself. !”

⚖️

18/100

“ ”

📚 Workload Pressure

10/100

“TOO MUCH WORK. If you have other classes or a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and rambling, so it's hard to stay engaged for two hours (no break).
  • Powerpoints are photos with no information.
  • Prepare to teach yourself. !

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Never gives full credits to any of .
  • She's very picky with grading and it feels as if she's looking for any small mistake to you mark down.
  • though, all multiple choice and open book, with lots of time to search the textbook, and we even got 2 attempts.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Insane amount of work.
  • .
  • if you DO NOT have to.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

The evidence is strong because 25 reviews span 2020 to 2026 and repeatedly describe the , and teaching issues.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 57
1 out of 513

Course coverage

ARTS2G11 reviews
ASAM408 reviews
ASAMD0403 reviews
D00262 reviews
SP211 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

21 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 3 · A 3

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

10

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 9