AI Rate Professor

English

Audra Sorman

EWRT02 · EWRT2 · EWRIT1A · EWRT1A · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you want writing support and , but do not expect an effortless A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful Writing CoachHard GraderMixed ClaritySupportive but DemandingOlder Reviews Mostly Positive
  • Most older reviews describe Sorman as helpful, funny, and .
  • Several students say writing improves, but and .
  • The newest review is sharply negative and creates a real confidence issue.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

48/100

An A is possible, but comments point to , and real essay effort.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

The course content is manageable for prepared students, but , and summer pacing can make it demanding.

, and it shows both easy and demanding experiences.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

35/100

Only , while most reviews do not clearly prove the policy.

The and is sparse.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

, but and a severe recent complaint lower confidence.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Students mention hard grading and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The workload centers on reading and essays, with some students calling the class fast and demanding.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Most reviews praise her as helpful, funny, and supportive, but several cite or inexperience.

Format shift

and one recent negative review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews focus on papers, essays, reading, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive about support and personality, with , and one recent negative experience.

Main concern

The .

What students said

“she does grade hard but you have to work really hard in her class.”
EWRT1A
“As long as you do the .”
EWRIT1A
“ and doesnt tell you clearly how to improve”
EWRT1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or exam requirements.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“As long as you do the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and clarity. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“ ! Prof. Sorman is the .”

⚖️

35/100

“she does grade hard but you have to work really hard in her class.”

🧭 Clarity Risk

56/100

“ and doesnt tell you clearly how to improve”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Prof. Sorman is the .
  • she's friendly and a good teacher none the less.
  • Overall she's a good english teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • she does grade hard but you have to work really hard in her class.
  • You have to read a lot of textbook.
  • Not the easiest class, but .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • she appeared to lack confidence
  • her lecture is not that interesting at all.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

There are 10 reviews, but most are old and the newest review strongly conflicts with older positive comments.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

EWRT1A5 reviews
EWRIT1A2 reviews
EWRT22 reviews
EWRT021 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather_Not_Say 1