AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Reading

Anne Argyriou

CO01902 · ENG1A · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you can manage heavy writing work and tolerate disorganization.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy WorkloadCaring but DisorganizedLots of PapersMixed GradingClear Divide in Reviews
  • and serious complaints about confusion or workload.
  • Online evidence is only one review, but it and .
  • Getting an A can be realistic, yet the path .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many students earned A grades and some call it an easy A, but , and uneven grading keep it from being low effort.

, while the only online review reports a C and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The class can feel easy for independent students, but writing load, critical thinking, and .

In-person evidence is mixed, while online evidence is negative and workload-heavy.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

and others say it was not, so the policy appears inconsistent by section.

The only online review says attendance was not mandatory, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Students who , but disorganization, workload, and grading delays create major hesitation.

In-person reviews are divided, while the only online review says the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Some students report full points for late work and easy A outcomes, but and .

Format shift

Online grading evidence is negative, while .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Many reviews mention lots of , and falling behind after missing class.

Format shift

Both online and online review especially negative.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

She is often described as caring, but repeated comments about confusion, disorganization, and .

Format shift

and strong criticism, while online evidence is mainly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

, and reading rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with several students praising her caring style while others , and disorganization.

Main concern

The guidance.

What students said

“I worked hard and received an A.”
Eng1A
“If you miss a class .”
Eng1A
“ and hard to understand.”
CO01902

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is , and tough grading.

Main concern

The main .

What students said

“does not grade anything on time.”
Eng1A
“though grader and way too many hws.”
Eng1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or exam requirements.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

The online review .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Nice person but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and organization. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“very nice and caring. will allow students to engage in class discussions.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“If you miss a class .”

⚖️ Grade Experience

62/100

“Class was an easy A for me.”

Theme 1

❤️ About Support

  • ; if you approach her, she will help you.
  • very nice and caring.
  • She was very sweet and understanding.

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • I worked hard and received an A.
  • There is a lot of
  • Light workload and an easy A.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • does not grade anything on time.
  • and hard to understand.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

The 10 reviews are detailed and mostly recent, but the opinions are sharply split across sections and formats.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

Eng1A8 reviews
CO019022 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1