AI Rate Professor

Mathematics & Statistics

Sundararajan Arabhi

MATH212 · MATH1A · MATH210 · MATH31 · MATH22 · MATH41 · MATH42 · MATH1B · MATH114 · 39 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
59.26%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Take Arabhi if you can keep up with a fast math pace and want support, but avoid her if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra Credit HeavyFast-Paced LecturesLots of HomeworkCaring but PolarizingTest Heavy
  • Students , and , but many say lectures move too fast.
  • Getting a good grade is possible, but , and attendance.
  • The in-person record is mixed, while the single online review is strongly positive.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

An A is realistic because of and fair chances, but , and tests require real effort.

The single online review supports and , while in-person reviews show the main grade cost is heavy weekly work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The math content is manageable for prepared students, but fast lectures and .

Online evidence sounds organized, while and skipped steps.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

35/100

because of frequent quizzes, participation, and fast-moving lessons.

The , and many in-person reviews also say skipping hurts performance.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

64/100

and , but many warn against her pace and workload.

Online evidence is positive but only one review, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

, dropped scores, partial credit, and , but several students still call her tough or harsh.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions , while in-person evidence includes both generous opportunities and .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Reviews repeatedly , and test-heavy structure.

Format shift

Both formats mention homework, but the heavy workload pattern .

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

, and helpful, but and skipped steps create a real split in student experience.

Format shift

The online review is strongly positive, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Grades appear , and finals rather than one single method.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide most assessment evidence, while the , and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

38 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are polarized, with strong praise for care and but repeated , and strict grading.

Main concern

.

What students said

“Her lectures were amazing but if of effort.”
MATH31
“ and she is a .”
MATH1B
“Very easy class! If you do the work you will 100% get an A.”
MATH41

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The only online review is , and .

Main concern

The online evidence is too limited to prove a stable pattern.

What students said

“Prof Arabhi made me enjoy math!”
MATH31
“ and thorough”
MATH31

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show frequent quizzes and exams with some student-friendly aids, but the final and .

Frequent QuizzesFrequent ExamsOpen Notes FinalNotecard AllowedChallenging Final

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exams, with some notes or cheat-sheet support but .

Frequent QuizzesFrequent ExamsOpen Notes FinalNotecard Allowed
“allowed to bring a notecard for quizzes”
MATH31
“it was open notes but still was very challenging”
MATH1A
“Weekly quizzes and 4 exams”
MATH1B

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, or take-home policy.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Her lectures were amazing but if of effort.”

Voice snapshots generated from 39 reviews, highlighting repeated themes in , and support; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“She was such a great teacher, her lectures made sense to me and she prints out the notes for students to fill out which made studying and finding notes much easier.”

⚖️

62/100

“She gives a lot of , and grades pretty good!”

📚 Workload

28/100

“HW everyday, 1-2 .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures are easy to understand
  • Lectures are fast but .
  • Rushed lectures & constantly skips steps

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Work

  • If you do the work you will 100% get an A.
  • , and exams almost every other Thursday.
  • She gives a lot of , and grades pretty good!

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • She is very sweet and really wants her students to succeed.
  • and
  • if you need help on a certain question or problem in the homework.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

39

Recent reviews read by the AI

39

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The record has 39 reviews across many years, many courses, and , and support.

Inside 39 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 58
3 out of 55
2 out of 56
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH1A10 reviews
MATH1B8 reviews
MATH316 reviews
MATH2125 reviews
MATH1144 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MATH413 reviews
MATH2101 review
MATH221 review
MATH421 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

33 reported outcomes

A range

19

A+ 7 · A 6 · A- 6

B range

4

B 4

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 3