AI Rate Professor

Film amp Television

Thomas Gamburg

FTV60B · FTV43 · FTV60A · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you are serious about film or screenwriting and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerExceptional feedbackCaring mentorCreative growthTough but fairHighly recommended
  • Every review gives him the highest teaching rating and recommends him.
  • Students praise detailed, personalized feedback that improves their work.
  • The class is not a free A, but and learning-focused.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

A-range grades are common, but students describe tough grading and the .

Both formats show strong outcomes, but the online review .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The material is manageable for committed students, but the work requires craft discipline and attention.

In-person reviews emphasize creative and technical growth, while the online review says recovery from early weak work is hard.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

mandatory and others not mandatory.

The as mandatory, while .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and care noticeably improve their work.

Both online and richer.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

He is sometimes called a , but , and forgiveness.

Format shift

Online evidence stresses tough grading, while and .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Reviews do not describe overwhelming workload, but .

Format shift

The online review mentions about 10 assignments, while and learning than workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students consistently praise , and ability to develop creative work.

Format shift

Both formats support excellent teaching, with stronger detail from in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and creative improvement rather than exams.

Format shift

, and no review clearly centers exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe , and serious creative growth.

Main concern

Students must pay attention and engage seriously with the craft.

What students said

“ .”
FTV60A
“Take his class if you really want to learn because he pours in and wants you to reciprocate.”
FTV60B

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The and late-assignment forgiveness but says early mistakes are hard to recover from.

Main concern

if you fall behind early.

What students said

“He is a but that's because he knows what he wants”
FTV60A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The and class work but do not clearly prove exam policy.

Online

The online review discusses assignments and grading but .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“Take his class if you are serious about filmmaking!”

⚖️

50/100

“He is a but that's because he knows what he wants”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Thomas is an incredible screenwriting instructor!
  • He carefully balanced technical WITH drawing out creativity from us, thru inspiration & care.
  • Thomas knows his stuff.

Theme 2

📝

  • .
  • I'd wait in anticipation for .
  • He was clear about what he wanted and .

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • He is a but that's because he knows what he wants
  • for the initial stumbling while we found our bearings.
  • His class was challenging and fair.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed and highly consistent reviews support the pattern, but the total sample is still small.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

FTV60A3 reviews
FTV431 review
FTV60B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 3 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values