AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · English As A Second Language

Tram Dang

ESL273ESL473 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

unless you can , and a highly mixed teaching experience.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerLots of HomeworkTest HeavyTough GraderLecture HeavyReading Required
  • Most reviews describe a very negative classroom experience.
  • Students report , and .
  • as not mandatory, but participation still matters.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Getting an A looks possible, but , and high difficulty make it costly.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Students rate the course as very difficult and , and tests.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

95/100

, though one tag says participation matters.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most comments are strongly negative, and only one review clearly says the .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

A tough-grader tag and high .

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

20/100

Students mention lots of , and test-heavy assessment.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Two of three reviews describe the teacher as terrible, while one short review says the professor is good.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

and reading.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with two students calling the teacher terrible and one giving brief praise.

Main concern

Heavy work and poor teaching experience are the main concerns.

What students said

“the most terrible teacher I have ever seen， if u want to have great experience”
ESL273ESL473
“terrible teacher believe me”
ESL273ESL473
“Good guy”
ESL273ESL473

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a test-heavy course, but they .

Test HeavyExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove the .

Test HeavyExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“Lots of ”
ESL273ESL473

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“the most terrible teacher I have ever seen， if u want to have great experience”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and tests. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“terrible teacher believe me”

📚 Workload Pressure

20/100

“Lots of ”

⚖️

25/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • the most terrible teacher I have ever seen， if u want to have great experience
  • terrible teacher believe me
  • Good guy

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • 5
  • A

Theme 3

🧪

  • Lots of

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

, and two are very brief, so the but not deeply documented.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ESL273ESL4733 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values