AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Hammond Laurie

ACCT87AI · ACCT87 · ACCT87G · ACCT001A · ACCT64 · ACCT88 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
46.67%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you can follow written instructions independently, but if you need strong live teaching.

Best fit · Self Taught ProClear grading criteriaAccessible outside classSelf-study heavyMixed teaching qualityWorkload varies by course
  • Recent online accounting reviews are .
  • Students often say grades are achievable if they follow instructions and complete the work.
  • Negative reviews focus on weak lectures, self-teaching, heavy work, and limited help.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

An A is realistic when students complete the required homework and follow instructions, but and .

Online evidence is more clearly grade-friendly, while and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

The content is usually straightforward accounting software work, but Excel or .

Online courses look more structured, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

68/100

Many reviews say attendance is not mandatory, but a as required.

Online reviews mostly say attendance is not mandatory, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Students recommend her when the class is structured and online, but .

Online reviews are mostly recommended, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and sometimes adjusted fairly, but several students call her a .

Format shift

Online reviews mention clear criteria and occasional grade adjustment, while .

Workload

Moderate

42/100

The workload is manageable for organized students but several reviews mention lots of homework and .

Format shift

Online work is structured through Cengage and assignments, while in-person ACCT88 reviews describe heavier self-study.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Recent reviews praise her availability and clarity, but older reviews repeatedly say lectures are weak or unhelpful.

Format shift

Online teaching reviews are stronger, while and examples.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

, and Cengage more than exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention Cengage tests and assignments, while , and a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and helpfulness but many complaints about weak teaching and self-study.

Main concern

Several students say lectures do not add much and the class can feel like independent work.

What students said

No need to come to the class, you are good without her lecture if you have Textbooks.
ACCT64
The class was more about self-studying rather than learning in class.
ACCT88
Basically if you do your homeworks from the book, you will get a good grade.
ACCT88

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly positive for , and achievable grades, with two strong negative outliers.

Main concern

Some students felt unsupported when assignments became confusing or .

What students said

Follow what is required to get an A.
ACCT64
Professor Hammond was very helpful if I had questions and even adjusted if the .
ACCT87AI
Just horrible! and argumentative.
ACCT87AI

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention Cengage tests, chapter quizzes, one midterm, and a final, but .

Cengage TestsChapter QuizzesMidterm And Final MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Midterm And Final TestProjects RequiredPolicy Not Clearly Proven
1 midterm and . 2 projects required.
ACCT88

Online

Online reviews mention Cengage tests and chapter quizzes, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Cengage TestsChapter QuizzesPolicy Not Clearly Proven
.
ACCT64
There are discussions and chapter quizzes.
ACCT87AI

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

Follow the instructions, do the work, participate in the discussions, and you'll do fine.

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting format differences in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

Lauri is not an effective teacher.

👍 Recommendation Level

55/100

Good class and I learned a lot!

⚖️

58/100

She provides an to help you understand/check your work.

Theme 1

📘 About Structure And Grades

  • Follow what is required to get an A.
  • and reminds you of assignment deadlines.
  • Basically if you do your homeworks from the book, you will get a good grade.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Teaching Concerns

  • No teaching involved whatsoever.
  • The class was more about self-studying rather than learning in class.

Theme 3

💬 About Helpfulness

  • She is there for you just ask questions.
  • Professor Hammond was available and .
  • You can always check in during her office hours if you don't understand something.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The dataset has 20 reviews across many years and courses, but opinions differ strongly by course format and time period.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 58

Course coverage

ACCT888 reviews
ACCT645 reviews
ACCT87AI4 reviews
ACCT001A1 review
ACCT871 review
Show 1 more courses
ACCT87G1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 3 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 1