AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Alysia Rueda

HUMI001 · HUMI6 · HUM06 · POPHUMA · HIST001 · HUMI1 · HUMI01 · HUM6 · HUMANITIES51 · HUMA51 · HUMI35 · HUMI006 · HUMI7 · HUMI51 · 51 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
45.45%
Difficulty
1.9

The decision

for a strong or consistent learning experience.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy AHeavy HomeworkDisorganized LecturesExtra CreditPolarizing Teaching
  • Grades are often easy, but many students say the work feels excessive for a humanities course.
  • Teaching reviews are sharply mixed, with repeated complaints about vague directions, rambling lectures, and weak responsiveness.
  • Online reviews lean easier on attendance but and discussions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

An A is usually attainable because many reviews mention easy grading, , and simple assignments, but the workload can still be annoying.

Online and , while online comments emphasize frequent weekly tasks.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

82/100

The content is generally described as simple and low-level, with difficulty coming more from vague directions and busywork than hard material.

Both formats describe easy content, with and organization.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Online attendance is generally not mandatory, while as required or participation-based.

Online evidence is flexible, but and often stricter.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Students recommend her only if the goal is an easy grade, because many comments say the class is boring, vague, or low-value.

Online reviews are less harsh but workload-focused, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Grades are often easy with , but some students report arbitrary or .

Format shift

Both formats support lenient outcomes, but in-person reviews include .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Many students describe lots of , and repeated small assignments.

Format shift

Online reviews especially stress weekly workload, while or pointless.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Positive comments praise kindness, but many reviews describe vague, disorganized, boring, or unhelpful teaching.

Format shift

Online reviews are more moderate, while in-person reviews contain the strongest complaints about teaching quality.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears to mix weekly , and finals.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize discussions and weekly assignments, while , and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

grades and , but many students criticize vague teaching, pointless work, and lecture quality.

Main concern

The main concern is weak .

What students said

“Easy A class but .”
HUMI1
“Avoid if you can. Easy A but waste of time.”
HUMI1
“She gives a lot of so it's not hard to get an A.”
HUMI01

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews describe an easy grade with , but , and slow or disputed grading create frustration.

Main concern

The main concern and .

What students said

“This class .”
HUMI1
“An easy A if you just do the work”
HUMI001
“ .”
HUMI01

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear student-friendly when described, with questions given ahead, easy multiple-choice tests, or .

Questions Given AheadTake-Home Style FinalsEasy Multiple ChoiceLow-Stress Final

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention easy multiple-choice exams, finals given ahead, and , but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules.

Questions Given AheadEasy Multiple ChoiceLow-Stakes Final
“midterms and .”
HUMI01
“the participate in a survey.”
HUMI001

Online

Online reviews support student-friendly exams because midterm and final questions were given days ahead, but they .

Questions Given AheadNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“ so there's no rush.”
HUMI001

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy A class but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting recurring themes in , and teaching consistency. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Avoid if you can. Easy A but waste of time.”

📈 Grade Ease

86/100

“An easy A if you just do the work”

⚖️ Workload Reality

30/100

“ .”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Easy A class but .
  • This class was very easy and the source material was fun.
  • She gives a lot of so it's not hard to get an A.

Theme 2

🧭 About Teaching Style

  • She was super vague about everything, I never really understood what she was saying but .
  • .
  • Great professor, lecture heavy but easy to understand.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Lots of unecessary HW.
  • .
  • There are long and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

51

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The evidence is strong because 50 reviews span many years and repeatedly show the same easy-grade but weak-teaching pattern.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 56
3 out of 58
2 out of 512
1 out of 517

Course coverage

HUMI611 reviews
HUMI110 reviews
HUMI018 reviews
HUMI0016 reviews
HUM63 reviews
Show 9 more courses
HIST0012 reviews
HUMI512 reviews
HUMI72 reviews
HUM061 review
HUMA511 review
HUMANITIES511 review
HUMI0061 review
HUMI351 review
POPHUMA1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

19

A+ 11 · A 7 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1