AI Rate Professor

Humanities

RaeAnn Ramsey

D006 · 30 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
74.19%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Take her if you can keep up with reading and writing, but if and very lenient grading.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring supportClear organizationReading and writing heavyPolarizing gradingOnline friendly
  • Recent reviews are strongly positive and , and engaging teaching.
  • Grades are usually reachable, but students must keep up with , and deadlines.
  • Older negative reviews complain , and heavy writing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

An A is realistic if students do the readings, writing, and deadlines, but .

Online reviews give the clearest easy-A evidence, while .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The content is usually manageable and , but reading and .

Online reviews range from super easy to writing-heavy, while as manageable with participation.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

marked mandatory and others not mandatory.

Both online and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most recent students recommend her for support and organization, but .

Online evidence is more polarized, while sample.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Grades are often high and , but and limited feedback.

Format shift

Online reviews contain both generous grading praise and , while .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The workload is mostly reading and writing, manageable for steady students but heavy for students who dislike essays.

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly posts, essays, and readings, while and readings.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Recent students call her enthusiastic, helpful, and organized, but older reviews describe poor communication and harsh responses.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is highly polarized, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews emphasize discussion posts, essays, readings, writing assignments, and essay exams.

Format shift

Online reviews provide the strongest evidence for assignment-heavy assessment; in-person assessment details are limited.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are mostly positive and praise engaging lectures, support, and manageable work, with .

Main concern

Attendance and participation matter in some in-person sections.

What students said

“I felt like I learned a lot and never got bored.”
D006
“The class is very manageable if you participate and do the readings.”
D006
“she did weird things to us to get a good grade”
D006

Remote format

Online

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly positive in recent terms, with , and and writing load.

Main concern

Some , and essay-heavy work.

What students said

“ and open book.”
D006
“Just as long as you meet deadlines and put in the work, you'll get an A.”
D006
“She made this class more difficult than it needed to be, and her emails were passive aggressive when asking for help.”
D006

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but one review describes long 1000-word exams, so the format is friendly but writing-heavy.

Open BookEasy Essay ExamsWriting-Based Exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews explicitly support open-book essay exams, with some concern about long writing requirements.

Open BookEasy Essay Exams1000 Word Exams
“ and open book.”
D006
“exams are 1000 word”
D006

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Just as long as you meet deadlines and put in the work, you'll get an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 31 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“She always felt so animated and enthusiastic when teaching.”

👍 Recommendation Level

78/100

“ .”

⚖️

58/100

“Writing assignments never graded for full pts .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her enthusiasm for the curriculum makes it exciting to learn.
  • She is intelligent and takes the so that everyone can understand.
  • Her lectures are engaging. Learned a lot and felt supported the whole term.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • And .
  • Just as long as you meet deadlines and put in the work, you'll get an A.
  • Even if you meet all requirements of .

Theme 3

✍️ About Workload

  • Just a and a 500-word essay.
  • There is a lot to write about, but it's not difficult, and with enough time and dedication, everything can be accomplished.
  • STAY AWAY unless u want to write a million words

Theme 4

💬 About Support

  • . .
  • she actually takes the time to help when you ask.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

31

Recent reviews read by the AI

30

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-one reviews across multiple years give strong coverage, though online reviews .

Inside 31 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 523
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

D00631 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

31 reported outcomes

A range

21

A+ 1 · A 12 · A- 8

B range

8

B+ 3 · B 4 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2