AI Rate Professor

English

Laura Martin

ERWT1A · EWRT2 · EWRT1A · EWRT1B · 36 lifetime ratings

AI rating
61/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
67.86%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Take Laura Martin if you want writing improvement and , and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy readingMany papersDetailed feedbackSlow gradingStrict essay grading
  • Students often learn and and revisions.
  • The class is workload-heavy with lots of reading, essays, and .
  • Grades can still be good if students keep up, revise work, and participate.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many students earn A grades, but comments repeatedly say the A , and patience with .

Online and , but online comments stress workload while in-person comments are more polarized.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The material is not conceptually impossible, but the , and discussion style make it demanding.

Online classes often feel assignment-heavy, while and participation pressure.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

38/100

Attendance is inconsistent across reviews, with and some classes marked not mandatory.

Online evidence includes both optional asynchronous work and strict engagement, while and participation.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

and improvement, but workload, slow grading, and strict essay standards create real hesitation.

Online reviews are moderately favorable, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

She is often called strict or tough, but revisions, feedback, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention tough grading and , while .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of reading, many papers, weekly posts, and .

Format shift

Both formats show heavy workload, with and discussions.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Her feedback and care are strengths, but , and unclear expectations.

Format shift

Online teaching is praised for feedback and email replies, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Grades are mainly , and revisions rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Online and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

praise for feedback and inspiration to warnings about boredom, essays, and strict grading.

Main concern

Students who dislike reading, discussion, or essay revision may find the class stressful.

What students said

“Take her class if you want to have a nightmare for the whole quarter”
ERWT1A
“I am not good at english and still did well.”
EWRT1A
“Multiple papers (4), no exams.”
EWRT2

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews emphasize heavy reading and , and some student-friendly no-test structures.

Main concern

The online workload can be demanding and grades may arrive very late.

What students said

“Lots of most time for me.”
EWRT2
“ . No Camera.”
ERWT1A
“It is not an easy A but .”
EWRT2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but many reviews describe writing-based courses with few or no traditional exams.

No Tests Or QuizzesNo CameraTimed WriteIn-Class ExamNo Exams

Assessment risk

Varies

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews include conflicting evidence, with some classes having no exams and others mentioning an in-class exam or midterms and finals.

No ExamsIn-Class ExamMidterms And Finals Mentioned
“Multiple papers (4), no exams.”
EWRT2
“One in .”
ERWT1A
“most of what she says during class is material for her midterms and finals.”
EWRT1A

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention no tests or class, and one timed write at the end.

No Tests Or QuizzesNo CameraTimed Write
“ .”
EWRT2
“ . No Camera.”
ERWT1A
“1 timed write at end of quarter”
ERWT1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“It is not an easy A but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 36 reviews, , and online versus in-person differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“The and helpful though.”

📚 Workload Reality

25/100

“Lots of most time for me.”

⚖️

45/100

“ but lets you rewrite them and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She .
  • She genuinely wants you to do well in class and in your future.
  • Laura's class is very long and boring.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • It is not an easy A but .
  • I hardly got an A but I was so stressed for the whole 3 months bc of this class.
  • If you try your best, listen to feedback, do all the work, then an A is very possible.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • 4 Papers - Weekly reading/discussions posts + response
  • Grade determined pretty much by 5 essays and bunch of reading assignments.
  • Lots of

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

36

Recent reviews read by the AI

36

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-six reviews across many years provide broad evidence, though .

Inside 36 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 511
3 out of 54
2 out of 54
1 out of 53

Course coverage

EWRT216 reviews
ERWT1A11 reviews
EWRT1B5 reviews
EWRT1A4 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

16

A 12 · A- 4

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Not sure yet 3 · Not_Sure_Yet 1 · Rather not say 1