AI Rate Professor

English

Anne Argyriou

D001A · EWRT100 · EWRT2 · ENG211 · ENG101 · EWRT1ALART250 · READ211 · EWRT211 · EWRT1A · ENG201 · 123 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
37.21%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you can handle frequent writing, strict rules, and limited flexibility.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy writing workloadStrict gradingParticipation mattersPoor feedback consistencyHelpful when organized
  • Students often describe the class as writing-heavy with strict deadlines and little flexibility.
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who value her help and students who feel unsupported.
  • Getting a good grade is possible, but it usually requires staying on schedule and following rubrics closely.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

A good grade is possible, but students repeatedly say it depends on heavy writing, strict deadlines, and .

Online evidence is harsher about grading, while by closely following instructions.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The material is usually standard English and writing work, but the workload, rubrics, and pacing make the experience harder.

Online reviews emphasize hard-to-manage structure, while , and participation.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

as mandatory or say participation and in-class work directly affect grades.

Both formats include mandatory-attendance reports, but missing classwork.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

37/100

Recommendation is low because many students complain about strict , and little flexibility.

Online reviews lean more negative, while experiences.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students often describe , and limited sympathy for late or revised work.

Format shift

Online reviews are , while in-person reviews include both strict and .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

The workload is commonly described as , and rushed essays.

Format shift

Online students describe the workload as hard to keep up with, while , and participation tasks.

Teaching experience

Poor

41/100

Some students find her caring and helpful, but many others , and limited teaching support.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is mostly negative, while and poor classroom structure.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment , and rubrics, with exams mentioned less often.

Format shift

Online reviews focus on written assignments and rubrics, while , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, but many students report , and inconsistent feedback.

Main concern

The main risk is strict grading combined with a high volume of essays and classwork.

What students said

“Submit homework on time or else you lose 10% each day, stay on track and you will be fine!”
D001A
“The professor is kind, but her workload is overwhelming.”
EWRT1A
“If you follow her format and instructions, you'll be fine.”
EWRT1ALART250

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, with , and hard-to-follow assignment structure.

Main concern

Online students often say the workload and .

What students said

“ unless you have a lot of spare time.”
EWRT1A
“So .Hard to keep up with assignments, and she grades them extremely strictly.”
EWRT1A
“as long as you stick to the .”
EWRT2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited, with in-person comments mentioning midterms and finals but .

Two MidtermsFinalEssay Final

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and , but do not clearly prove closed-book or strict proctoring rules.

Two MidtermsFinalEssay Final
“ and a final but they are relatively easy if .”
READ211
“For each class, there were 4 essays the last ones were the final.”
EWRT1ALART250
“We had 2 midterms and 1 final which wasn't that hard.”
READ211

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The professor is kind, but her workload is overwhelming.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

41/100

“Professor did not have good organization or .”

👍 Recommendation Risk

37/100

“Do yourself a favor and find someone else.”

⚖️

28/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Pressure

24/100

“I felt like I was constantly drowning.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Anne is a good teacher.
  • She doesn't really teach and you're just left learning on your own in groups.
  • Great professor. Very nice and helpful. .
  • Professor did not have good organization or .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of assignments and tough createria to get a high score
  • as long as you stick to the .
  • This class is easy, but she makes it hard for no reason.
  • The only way that you will not get an A is not doing the work, a lot of hw but they're very clearly formatted

Theme 3

📝

  • The professor is kind, but her workload is overwhelming.
  • She gives loads of workload and next class
  • and .
  • as well and a .

Theme 4

🚪

  • Submit homework on time or else you lose 10% each day, stay on track and you will be fine!
  • missing an for a makeup.
  • You can't miss class because that goes on your participation which is key for passing her class.
  • Don't count on late work being excused.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

123

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The dataset has 50 reviews across many years and courses, with , and feedback.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 536
4 out of 515
3 out of 517
2 out of 515
1 out of 540

Course coverage

EWRT1A15 reviews
READ21112 reviews
EWRT26 reviews
ENG2114 reviews
D001A3 reviews
Show 5 more courses
ENG1013 reviews
EWRT1003 reviews
EWRT1ALART2502 reviews
ENG2011 review
EWRT2111 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

41 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 2 · A 5 · A- 6

B range

15

B+ 6 · B 5 · B- 4

C range

1

C 1

D range

2

D+ 2

F

3

F 3

No letter grade reported

7

Not sure yet 6 · Rather not say 1