AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

Alex Morgan

CIS03 · CIS3 · CIS003 · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid Alex Morgan unless you already know the material and only need to survive the course independently.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear instructionsDisorganizedPoor teachingHard testsOutdated lectures
  • Students overwhelmingly say he does not teach clearly and gives vague instructions.
  • Some students can still earn high grades, but the learning experience is consistently poor.
  • and lecture complaints, while online reviews emphasize vague assignments and lack of help.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some students report easy grades or , but , and vague assignments make the A unreliable.

Online evidence leans easier for grades, while because exams and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The material is often basic, but students say the professor overcomplicates simple concepts and instructions.

Both formats describe simple content made harder by poor organization and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

52/100

Some recent sections mark attendance as optional, while .

Online reviews show optional attendance, while participation-based sections.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Students rarely recommend him because they describe weak teaching, vague instructions, poor support, and difficult exams.

Both formats are negative, with in-person reviews providing broader and longer-running evidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

A few students mention easy grading, but , and harsh or .

Format shift

Online has some easy-grade evidence, while and grading uncertainty.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students mention lots of homework, projects, case work, labs, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention vague assignments, while , and case studies.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Most reviews say he is unclear, disorganized, unhelpful, outdated, or .

Format shift

Both formats show poor teaching, but .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Grades appear to involve projects and assignments, but many , and memorization.

Format shift

Online evidence focuses more on assignments, while and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are strongly negative, with repeated complaints about , and .

Main concern

Students say lectures and , and exams can be difficult despite simple course material.

What students said

“You won't learn anything in this class.”
CIS003
“The class material is simple, but he over-complicates everything.”
CIS003

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews say the class can be graded easily, but students learn little and struggle with and weak support.

Main concern

The and does not provide useful help when students ask questions.

What students said

“didn't teach anything and made us rely on some outdated poorly made presentations”
CIS003
“ ”
CIS3

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and memorization-heavy expectations, with no clear proof of online proctoring or open-book rules.

Difficult TestsMidterm And FinalMemorizationRushed QuizzesReviews do not clearly prove proctoring

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final structure, rushed quizzes, and memorizing flash cards.

Difficult TestsMidterm And FinalRushed QuizzesFlash Card Memorization
“The !!!!!!!! the .”
CIS3
“memorize flash card questions and you'll be fine.”
CIS003

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy A+. He so have fun. You won't learn anything in this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews, highlighting recurring themes in , and ; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“This is the worst teacher I have ever had. and expect students already know everything”

👍 Recommendation Rate

12/100

“ .”

⚖️ Grade Risk

55/100

“as long as . assignments are pretty easy and he also gives lots of .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Doesn't teach, just puts up messy presentations and videos that were made by other people and not meant for a college class.
  • and unclear on what needs to be done for assignments.
  • Not a very good teacher. I often felt lost when I'm in the class.

Theme 2

🧾 About Instructions & Organization

  • There's never a in.
  • He doesn't follow the textbook at all, and .

Theme 3

🧪

  • This guy is useless. .
  • the . and final.
  • Testes are hard. .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

The 24 reviews span many years and are highly consistent about poor teaching, though .

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 56
2 out of 57
1 out of 510

Course coverage

CIS312 reviews
CIS0039 reviews
CIS033 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3