AI Rate Professor

English

Jill Quigley

EWRT1AS · EWRT200 · ENGL200 · EWRT1B · EWRT100 · ELIT11 · ELIT101 · ELIT21 · ELIT10 · EWRT1BH · EWRT1A · INTROTOPOETRY · EWRT100A · EWRT211 · ENG100B · 100B · EWRT1BHONORS · 177 lifetime ratings

AI rating
99/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
98%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a and writing feel meaningful while still expecting real effort.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExceptional SupportCaring MentorStrong FeedbackReading Heavy but Worth ItMust Take
  • Students overwhelmingly describe her as one of the , and .
  • The class , and participation, but students say her feedback makes the work manageable.
  • Grades are strong for students who read, participate, and use her help, but she is not a pure no-effort A.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

79/100

A good grade is very achievable with reading, participation, essays, and revisions, but students must do real work rather than just show up.

Both formats report strong grades, while online and and writing effort.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Her support makes English and literature approachable, but , and .

Online and but real academic work.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

41/100

, though some reviews report it was not mandatory.

Both online and and some optional ones.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students almost universally recommend her because she is caring, inspiring, responsive, and .

Both online and dissent about politics.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

She is fair and , and help, but students say they still need to earn passing grades through real work.

Format shift

Both formats show supportive grading, while advantage of her kindness.

Workload

Moderate

56/100

, and occasional exams or presentations, but students call it manageable with effort.

Format shift

Online and and writing, with some online classes adding weekly Zoom or journal work.

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Comments overwhelmingly praise her as , and unusually committed to student growth.

Format shift

Both formats strongly support excellent teaching quality.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment is mostly , and presentations, with some midterms or finals mentioned.

Format shift

Online reviews mention journals, midterms, finals, and presentations, while , and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe an outstanding, caring, discussion-based and helps students improve.

Main concern

Some courses require a lot of reading and consistent participation.

What students said

“She is the sweetest professor I've ever had.”
EWRT1A
“She is an amazing professor and such a genuine person.”
EWRT1B
“Lots of reading. Not a blow off by any means.”
ELIT10

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are extremely positive, describing engaging Zoom or , and supportive pacing.

Main concern

Online students still report reading, writing, journals, and participation expectations.

What students said

“ I could take every class with her.”
EWRT1B
“Always looked forward to zooms every week.”
ELIT11
“She gives tons of and really remembers each student's work.”
EWRT1B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and presentations, but they do not clearly prove open-book, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or strict proctoring rules.

Essay ExamsMidtermFinalFinal PresentationJournals

Assessment risk

Standard

74/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention essay exams, major papers, midterms, and finals, but do .

Essay ExamsMajor PapersMidtermFinal
“ and .”
EWRT1B
“We have 3 .”
EWRT1BH
“Midterm and .”
ELIT10

Online

Online reviews mention Zoom, journals, one midterm, one final, and a , but .

Zoom MeetingsJournal AssignmentsMidtermFinalFinal Presentation
“Journal every week. 1 midterm, 1 final, 1 final presentation.”
ELIT11
“ ”
ELIT11
“class met once a wk on zoom”
ELIT11

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ I could take every class with her.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“She is truly one of the .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“ .”

⚖️ Effort and Grades

79/100

“Work hard and participate in class and you will get an A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She was so helpful and kind, and you can tell she loves teaching.
  • She gives tons of and really remembers each student's work.
  • She makes classes fun and engaging.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • The workload can be challenging, but with effort and using resources like Unstuckstudy, you'll excel.
  • You read a lot but she makes it enjoyable?
  • Lots of reading. Not a blow off by any means.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She cares deeply about her students' success.
  • She gets to know each student so she can help everyone in the way they need it.
  • She went above and beyond to prevent me from failing her class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

177

Lifetime ratings

96/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews across online and patterns, and only limited dissent.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5166
4 out of 57
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ELIT1010 reviews
EWRT1A8 reviews
EWRT1B7 reviews
ELIT116 reviews
EWRT2115 reviews
Show 12 more courses
EWRT1AS2 reviews
EWRT1BH2 reviews
100B1 review
ELIT1011 review
ELIT211 review
ENG100B1 review
ENGL2001 review
EWRT1001 review
EWRT100A1 review
EWRT1BHONORS1 review
EWRT2001 review
INTROTOPOETRY1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

39 reported outcomes

A range

31

A+ 9 · A 19 · A- 3

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 4