AI Rate Professor

Environmental Studies

Alicia De Toro

ES · ES2 · ES001 · ESCI1L · ESCI19 · ESCILAB · ESCI1LAB · ES1 · ESCI · ESCI1 · 73 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
68.42%
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

if you want a forgiving environmental studies class and can manage occasional disorganization and busywork.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy ACaringFlexible DeadlinesDisorganized At TimesAssignment-Heavy
  • Most students describe the class as an easy A with flexible grading, resubmissions, late work, or .
  • many praise her passion and care, while others say she is disorganized or slow to respond.
  • Workload is usually easy but can feel like too many small assignments, notes, projects, or papers.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Students repeatedly report A grades, easy assignments, , late work, resubmissions, and .

Both formats support an easy-A label, with online reviews giving especially clear evidence of resubmissions and flexible deadlines.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

85/100

The material is usually described as easy, straightforward, and , and short writing.

Online reviews emphasize easy asynchronous work, while , and no-test sections.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

62/100

Some sections require attendance, while many others .

Online sections are often flexible, but .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

, but a meaningful minority warn about disorganization and heavy busywork.

Online reviews are more consistently positive, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

86/100

Many students mention easy grading, , late submissions, resubmissions, and high grades.

Format shift

Online reviews give the strongest evidence for resubmissions and flexible deadlines, while boost.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Assignments are usually easy, but some students complain there are many small tasks, notes, papers, or projects.

Format shift

Online workload varies from two-hour weekly work to too many assignments, while and participation.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Students often call her caring and inspiring, but negative reviews describe disorganization, unclear guidance, and slow communication.

Format shift

Online reviews praise flexibility but mention self-teaching, while and disorganized.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews describe assignments, notes, projects, worksheets, group work, and .

Format shift

Both formats appear assignment-centered, with online sections using weekly work and in-person sections using participation and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

, caring personality, group work, and participation, but some students strongly criticize organization and teaching quality.

Main concern

The main risk is weak structure, unclear instructions, or feeling like the class is more about participation than learning.

What students said

“If you're looking for an .”
ESCI1
“ !”
ES1
“There's no quiz no test at all.”
ESCI1

Remote format

Online

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews are mostly positive about easy grading, flexible deadlines, and and slow replies.

Main concern

Online students may need self-discipline because the course and .

What students said

“Perfect online courses, you can resubmit your quiz many times”
ES1
“Her class is really easy but she makes you take lots of notes”
ESCI19
“As long as you do your work you will get an A.”
ES001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The clearest evidence points to project- and assignment-based assessment with little exam pressure in many sections.

No Quiz Or Test Evidence In Some SectionsFinal ProjectResubmissionsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

/test sections and project-based midterms and finals, with no clear proctoring evidence.

No Final In One SectionNo Quiz Or Test In One SectionProjects And Presentations
“ and there is .”
ES1
“There's no quiz no test at all.”
ESCI1
“Midterms and and presentations.”
ES2

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention easy quizzes with resubmissions and no quizzes or tests in one section, with no clear proof of proctoring or webcam rules.

Quiz ResubmissionsNo Quizzes Or Tests In One SectionFinal Project
“you can resubmit your quiz many times”
ES1
“No quizzes or tests”
ES001
“the and isn't hard at all”
ES

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“As long as you do your work you will get an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Easy A Signal

88/100

“If you're looking for an .”

❤️ Teaching Style

72/100

“She cares so deeply for her students and .”

📚 Workload Balance

58/100

“Easy assignments but so much of it.”

Theme 1

📈 About Grades

  • As long as you do your work you will get an A.
  • Loads of assignments but not graded harshly at all.
  • Gives many chances for and is super flexible and understanding.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • Professor De Toro was amazing!
  • She cares about her students and is always willing to help.
  • Very caring professor and gives out lots of optional resources on the topic.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • She gives out more assignments than she can grade.
  • teacher does nothing, you're going to have to teach yourself.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

73

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

The input provides 50 authoritative reviews across both formats, many years, and repeated themes about easy grading, flexibility, and uneven organization.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 534
4 out of 512
3 out of 59
2 out of 513
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ESCI112 reviews
ES111 reviews
ES00110 reviews
ES27 reviews
ESCI193 reviews
Show 5 more courses
ESCI2 reviews
ESCILAB2 reviews
ES1 review
ESCI1L1 review
ESCI1LAB1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

43 reported outcomes

A range

37

A+ 13 · A 21 · A- 3

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2