AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Medical Laboratory Technician

Alex Febo

HTEC · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
15/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can teach yourself and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnprepared lecturesDisorganized coursePoor feedbackUnclear examsSelf-taught risk
  • Both reviews rate teaching quality at the lowest level and describe poor preparation.
  • Students say lectures, schedules, exams, and .
  • One student earned an A, but the comments suggest the course experience was weak and self-directed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

One student got an A, but , and scheduling makes the grade feel risky.

All evidence comes from two in-person HTEC reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The material may not be inherently impossible, but disorganization and weak instruction make it hard to learn.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

and one says it was mandatory.

, and it conflicts.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Students describe unprepared , and exams that do not match lectures.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

One A suggests passing is possible, but and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Reviews criticize organization and instruction more than workload volume.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Both reviews say lectures were borrowed, disorganized, or .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention exams, labs, assignments, and group-work exams, but .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe an unprepared and and gives little useful feedback.

Main concern

The main while exams and schedules do not match instruction clearly.

What students said

“ .”
HTEC
“Syllabus and schedule .”
HTEC
“ .”
HTEC

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but reviews report group-work exams, poor lecture-test alignment, and short notice for .

Group Work ExamsExam Dates On Short NoticeLectures Did Not Reflect Tests

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and short notice, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Group Work ExamsExam Dates On Short NoticeLectures Did Not Reflect Tests
“ .”
HTEC
“ .”
HTEC
“ .”
HTEC

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“Couldn't answer basic questions about the course.”

🗂️ Course Organization

20/100

“Syllabus and schedule .”

⚖️ Assessment Risk

45/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Used other people's lectures, videos, syllabi, and exams.
  • Professor does not prepare his own lectures; shows a bunch of youtube videos and other material from other professor.
  • Couldn't answer basic questions about the course.

Theme 2

📋 About Organization

  • Syllabus and schedule .
  • Students did not get a schedule of the class until mid-way quarter or drop.
  • .

Theme 3

🧪

  • .
  • .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only , but both are detailed and consistently negative.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

HTEC2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1