AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Vadim von Brzeski

MATH1C · MATH212 · MATH1A · MATH1B · MATH1D · MATH41 · MATH42 · MATH12 · 32 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
72.73%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you want a strong math teacher and are willing to practice for .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear ExplainerExtra CreditAccessible HelpTest HeavyFast Lectures
  • Most students praise him as , and .
  • Grades are helped by and lenient grading, but .
  • He is strongest for students who attend, ask questions, and practice consistently.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

and , but difficult math exams still require practice.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

The courses are real math courses and often fast or .

and lower-division math courses.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Some reviews say attendance is required or tied to in-class work, while others .

All evidence is in person, and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

, and strong help outside class, despite tough exams in some courses.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Several students mention , lenient grading, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

, but practice is needed because exams and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

Most , and strong at explaining concepts, with a smaller set of sharp complaints for Math 1C.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is in person, with Math 1C reviews more divided than other courses.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

, and exam performance, even when homework or in-class problems exist.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

All evidence is in person, and most reviews describe a clear, helpful math professor with some fast lectures and .

Main concern

Students who struggle with stressful.

What students said

“ .”
MATH1D
“ , but do enough practice and you good.”
MATH1C
“ , and .”
MATH1B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often described as tricky or tough, but , and lenient grading make them manageable for prepared students.

MidtermsFinalTough ExamsExtra CreditNo Calculators

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention tough midterms and one course, and one note-sheet policy in another.

Tough ExamsMidtermsFinalExtra CreditNo CalculatorsNote Sheet
“While and .”
MATH1C
“calculators not allowed in exams”
MATH1C
“Let us have a sheet of notes for tests.”
MATH212

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Focuses on understanding the content rather than memorizing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 32 reviews, highlighting , and accessibility. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“He clearly knows what he's doing and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

82/100

“Prof V is by far the while at De Anza.”

⚖️

74/100

“ , and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He does a good job explaining why things are the way they are.
  • He is very knowledgeable and and clarity.
  • He does move really fast through lecture, but is ready to help in office hours and extra days.

Theme 2

🧮

  • , but do enough practice and you good.
  • and are tough.
  • Opportunities for and final led me to end with 100% in the class.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • He gives so many resources to help you succeed.
  • He is always open to questions.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

32

Recent reviews read by the AI

32

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-two reviews over many years give strong signal, though experiences differ by math level and Math 1C has more negative reviews.

Inside 32 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 523
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH126 reviews
MATH1C6 reviews
MATH416 reviews
MATH424 reviews
MATH1B3 reviews
Show 3 more courses
MATH2123 reviews
MATH1A2 reviews
MATH1D2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 8 · A 1 · A- 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

4

C 3 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 2