AI Rate Professor

English

Lydia Hearn

ELIT46 · ELIT41 · EWRT1 · ELIT11 · EWRT1B · ENG1B · EWRT2 · ELIT48C · EWRT1C · ENGLISH100 · 1A · ELIT48B · ELIT46C · ELIT46B · ENGLISH100B · EWRT2A · EWRT1A · 46C · 171 lifetime ratings

AI rating
85/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
86.67%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want to become a stronger writer and , and feedback.

Best fit · Effort For RewardDetailed feedbackLots of readingTough but fairCaring teacherExtra credit
  • , and ability to improve writing.
  • The class is not a blow-off course because readings, papers, discussions, and .
  • A high grade is possible, but many students say it requires steady effort and accepting detailed criticism.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many students earn A-range grades, but comments repeatedly say the A , and .

and , while In person reviews more often frame the effort as worth it.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The material is usually understandable, but writing, reading, and workload.

Both formats describe manageable content, but Online students complain more about workload intensity.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

38/100

Some Online sections have optional meetings, but as required, especially In person.

Online attendance varies by section, while In .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Most students recommend her because , and improves writing, even when they warn that the course is demanding.

Both formats are mostly positive, but Online has more sharp workload and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

She is often called a , but many students say the , and tied to improvement.

Format shift

Online reviews contain the , while In person reviews more often describe the grading as demanding but fair.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of , and frequent deadlines.

Format shift

Online workload is often described as constant, while In person workload is heavy but more connected to lectures and participation.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students , and ability to improve their writing.

Format shift

Both formats support excellent teaching, though Online has more complaints about structure and workload.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears to , and some exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes, discussions, and papers, while In , and exams more often.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person reviews praise engaging lectures, care, and growth in writing, while , and .

Main concern

In person students often need to attend, read, participate, and revise seriously to earn a high grade.

What students said

“She will definitely make you work for the high grade, but .”
EWRT2A
“don't be lazy because and ”
EWRT1A
“I got an A, but it was tough and she grades hard and has lots of criticism.”
EWRT2

Remote format

Online

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews praise clear directions, feedback, and flexibility, but and .

Main concern

Online students often report lots of work, frequent deadlines, and .

What students said

“ . Not an easy A class.”
EWRT2A
“ .”
EWRT2
“Lots of hw tho.”
EWRT1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes, papers, and some exams, but they do not clearly prove webcam rules, Lockdown Browser, open-book policy, or strict proctoring.

QuizzesPapersExamsNo clear proctoring evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In , and reading, with exams described as hard by one student but not clearly proctored.

PapersExamsParticipationAttendance taken
“ and her lectures go fast”
46C
“papersexams are easy as long as you read and pay attention”
ELIT41
“Participating in class and grade.”
ELIT11

Online

, and frequent deadlines, but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Online quizzesPapersDiscussion postsNo clear proctoring evidence
“100 word discussion posts every M-Thurs, 4 or 5 tutorial quizzes, three 3-page essays”
EWRT2
“ so do pay attention when you watch the videos or powerpoint”
EWRT2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She makes you work for the high grade, but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting repeated themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“She gives very helpful feedback that .”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“Lots of work.”

⚖️

45/100

“ and grades fairly (although some may argue she's a ).”

👍 Recommendation Rate

86/100

“ if you really want to learn how to write properly the rest of your college career.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a good lecturer, a , and someone who respects you as a person.
  • and during office hours you can get a lot of help.
  • Lydia gives inspirational lectures, she also cares about the personal wellbeing of students.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • This is not a blow off class at all.
  • . Not an easy A class.
  • She will definitely make you work for the high grade, but .
  • I got an A, but it was tough and she grades hard and has lots of criticism.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Lots of hw tho.
  • Lots of reading and tasks due every other day.
  • I won't lie there was around 4 or 7 assignments each week BUT and easy.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

171

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 50 reviews across many years and both formats, with , and recommendation.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5133
4 out of 522
3 out of 56
2 out of 56
1 out of 55

Course coverage

EWRT214 reviews
EWRT1A11 reviews
1A3 reviews
ELIT46B3 reviews
EWRT2A3 reviews
Show 13 more courses
ELIT112 reviews
ELIT48B2 reviews
EWRT1C2 reviews
46C1 review
ELIT411 review
ELIT461 review
ELIT46C1 review
ELIT48C1 review
ENG1B1 review
ENGLISH1001 review
ENGLISH100B1 review
EWRT11 review
EWRT1B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

40 reported outcomes

A range

27

A+ 5 · A 18 · A- 4

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

8

Not sure yet 6 · Rather not say 2