AI Rate Professor

Women's Studies

Julie Lewis

ICS8 · WMST008 · ICS36 · ICS96 · WMST8 · ICS10 · ICS9 · EWRT211 · WST008 · ICS11 · AFAM10 · ICSD018B63Z · HIST18 · ICS18 · ICS26 · ICS · 66 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if and writing and are willing to follow instructions very carefully.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy Writing LoadThought-Provoking MaterialCaring But InconsistentStrict FormattingEasy If You Do The Work
  • Many students find the material meaningful and the professor caring, especially in older positive reviews.
  • The main cost is , and projects.
  • Recent online reviews raise , and being dropped from class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

An A is very possible, but students usually earn , and careful formatting.

Online reviews include both easy-A claims and , while as fair if students participate and complete the work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The concepts are manageable, but the , and critical reflection make the course feel demanding.

Online courses feel more work-heavy and self-managed, while and discussion.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

non-mandatory and others requiring weekly participation or platform access.

Online flexibility is limited by weekly posts and access rules, while in-person .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Students recommend her when they value the material, but many warn that the workload and .

In-person evidence is more consistently positive, while online evidence is more polarized and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and completion-based in some classes, but several students report strict formatting deductions and .

Format shift

Online reviews show the strongest grading complaints, while grading.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The workload is consistently described as heavy because of , and projects.

Format shift

Online workload is especially writing-heavy, while , and essays.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

She is often described as caring, inspirational, and knowledgeable, but recent reviews report rude communication and poor support.

Format shift

, while online teaching quality depends heavily on clarity of instructions and email support.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assessment , and essay-style exams rather than traditional tests.

Format shift

Both formats lean heavily on written assignments, with online classes using more weekly discussion and reflection work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are more favorable overall, with students praising lectures, passion, and meaningful content while still noting a heavy workload.

Main concern

Students must participate, read, write, and keep up with .

What students said

“Professor Lewis is one of the most inspirational professors at De Anza.”
ICS26
“Honestly too much work for a community college ethnic studies class.”
AFAM10
“She is a and is very strict with everything on her syllabus so READ IT ALL!”
WMST8

Remote format

Online

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

many call it an easy A with lots of writing, while recent reviews warn about and .

Main concern

Online students repeatedly mention heavy writing, strict formatting, and communication problems.

What students said

“Beware of .”
AFAM10
“honestly, this class is just: do the work and you'll get a good grade.”
WMST008
“ .”
WMST8

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews , and assessment appears mostly writing-based.

MidtermFinal PaperEssay-Based AssessmentsTake-Home FinalWeekly Reflections

Assessment risk

Standard

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and written assignments, but do not clearly prove strict proctoring or closed-book rules.

MidtermTake-Home FinalWritten AssignmentsEssay Final
“pass the midterm and time and be in class.”
WMST008
“do well on the .”
ICS36

Online

Online reviews mention midterms, , and essays, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

MidtermFinal PaperWeekly ReflectionsDiscussion PostsEssay-Based Assessments
“1 discussion w/ 2 peer responses and 1(500 words/5 slides/ 3 min video) weekly reflection every week, 1 midterm, 1 project, and 1 final”
AFAM10
“Only a but and gives you lots of material!”
ICS9

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“honestly, this class is just: do the work and you'll get a good grade. but- way too much work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and online versus in-person differences. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Reality

30/100

“TONS OF .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Professor Lewis is one of the most inspirational professors at De Anza.”

⚖️

55/100

“Read her instructions carefully or .”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • Weekly 250 word discussion posts along with 2 replies as well as a 500 word reflection page at the end of the week.
  • Lots of , and homework.
  • There is certainly a lot of work to do, but you can tell she makes the effort to ensure the material is really interesting, relevant and current.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and helpful. I learned a lot.
  • Lewis' passion for social justice shows through her lectures.
  • This was one of the .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Risk

  • ! The good reviews fooled me.
  • Very unprofessional.
  • Don't recomend Her class , she doesn't help her students !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

66

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The dataset has 50 reviews across online and in-person formats, with detailed and , and mixed teaching experience.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 531
4 out of 517
3 out of 57
2 out of 55
1 out of 56

Course coverage

WMST0088 reviews
WMST88 reviews
ICS106 reviews
AFAM105 reviews
ICS85 reviews
Show 11 more courses
ICS264 reviews
ICS3 reviews
ICS182 reviews
ICS92 reviews
EWRT2111 review
HIST181 review
ICS111 review
ICS361 review
ICS961 review
ICSD018B63Z1 review
WST0081 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

34 reported outcomes

A range

26

A+ 7 · A 17 · A- 2

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2