AI Rate Professor

International Studies

Constance Cole

SPCH7 · ART2F · ARTS2F · ICS7 · ICS4 · INTL005 · COMM7 · ICS5 · ICSD007 · D007 · INTLD005 · WMST001 · WMSTD001 · SOCD004 · ICS007 · 110 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
7.32%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

unless you want a demanding class with , and unpredictable grading.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh GraderUnclear ExpectationsHeavy ReadingMandatory ParticipationAvoid Warning
  • as harsh, subjective, and hard to predict.
  • Many reviews say lectures and .
  • A small minority value her challenge and knowledge, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Even students who earned A-range grades describe extreme effort, picky grading, and .

Online and , but in-person reviews add stronger attendance and participation pressure.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The content is not always conceptually hard, but , and unclear expectations make the course feel difficult.

Online reviews emphasize confusing Canvas and assignment rules, while , and tests.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

14/100

, and missing class can hurt performance.

Online attendance varies by review, while and participation.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

The dominant student advice is to avoid her because , and expectations feel unclear.

Both online and few older in-person reviews recommending her.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

Students repeatedly call her a tough or and say grades are reduced even when instructions are followed.

Format shift

Both formats show harsh grading, with and in-person reviews stressing subjective participation and papers.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Reviews mention heavy reading, weekly reflections, strict deadlines, presentations, and time-consuming written work.

Format shift

Online reviews stress strict deadlines and weekly assignments, while , and presentations.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most reviews describe , poor support, rude feedback, and little practical teaching value.

Format shift

Online reviews focus on weak communication and limited support, while and .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades appear to come from readings, reflections, , and papers.

Format shift

Online reviews mention assignments, quizzes, and finals, while , and papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are also mostly negative, with repeated complaints , and being shut down in class.

Main concern

Students report and participation pressure with little room for disagreement.

What students said

“ .”
COMM7
“Got my first B, and I worked harder for this class than any other.”
ICS5
“ .”
ICS007

Remote format

Online

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, emphasizing confusing , and limited support.

Main concern

Students often say they had to figure out expectations through classmates or study groups.

What students said

“ .”
COMM7
“ .”
D007
“ .”
ICS007

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The exam environment appears strict because , and specific expected answers, but proctoring and book policy are not clearly proven.

Final MentionedTests And QuizzesPop QuizzesFill In The Blank TestsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Strict

24/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and quizzes, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring requirements.

Midterm MentionedFinal MentionedTests And QuizzesNo Clear Book Policy
“ easier.”
ICS007
“Expects you to be able to know everything in the book on the tests and quizzes.”
SOCD004
“ .”
ICS007

Online

Online reviews mention pop quizzes, tests, fill-in-the-blank tests, and final work, but do not clearly .

Pop QuizzesFill In The Blank TestsFinal MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“Beware of pop quizzes”
ART2F
“ what the textbook says.”
ICS007
“ ”
ICS007

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ as a last resort... Otherwise... RUN!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

8/100

“The .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“She didn't support my learning at all.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

12/100

“ .”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • Very aggressive and .
  • .
  • You never know what your grade is because and .

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and .
  • She didn't support my learning at all.
  • She spends most lectures explaining how she wants presentations/papers to be structured when that time could be spent teaching.

Theme 3

🚫 About Student Advice

  • .
  • if you can.
  • if she is teaching.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

110

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across online and consistent pattern of and low recommendation.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 513
3 out of 527
2 out of 516
1 out of 539

Course coverage

ICS00714 reviews
COMM76 reviews
ICS55 reviews
ICS75 reviews
ART2F4 reviews
Show 10 more courses
ARTS2F3 reviews
D0073 reviews
ICS42 reviews
WMST0012 reviews
ICSD0071 review
INTL0051 review
INTLD0051 review
SOCD0041 review
SPCH71 review
WMSTD0011 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

37 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 3 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

15

B+ 2 · B 8 · B- 5

C range

5

C 3 · C- 2

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

10

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 4 · Not sure yet 3