AI Rate Professor

Film amp Television

Christina Wright

FTVD001 · FTV1 · FTV001 · 32 lifetime ratings

AI rating
60/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
53.13%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you can handle heavy slides, writing, and but inconsistent experience.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLecture HeavyTough GraderLots of ReadingExtra CreditDetailed Feedback
  • Student experience is sharply split between excellent support and .
  • The course is usually manageable for grades, but the writing and .
  • Online reviews are more positive overall, while and attendance pressure more often.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

Many students earn A grades, but , and writing-heavy work keep it from being an easy A.

Online evidence shows more flexibility and , while and grading pressure.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

61/100

The film content is mostly introductory, but , and writing make it feel heavier than a simple GE class.

and writing, while in-person reviews emphasize long lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Attendance is often optional online but .

Online , while many in-person reviews report required attendance or in-class work.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

54/100

Students recommend her when they value detailed material and feedback, but and workload.

Online reviews are mixed but somewhat stronger, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Students repeatedly describe point deductions, nitpicking, and tough standards despite some and redo options.

Format shift

Online reviews mention both leniency and , while grade-critical.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

The course , and occasional papers or exams.

Format shift

Online workload centers on weekly Canvas work, while and in-class assignments.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Strong reviews praise clear lectures and passion, but negative reviews call the .

Format shift

Online teaching comments praise Canvas organization in newer reviews but criticize communication in older ones, while in-person comments are more split.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades , and participation rather than one single method.

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly writing, midterm, final, and term paper; , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students describe long lecture blocks with some strong teaching, but attendance and .

Main concern

The four-hour lecture format and .

What students said

“Lecture for full 4 hours every time.”
FTVD001
“She walks you through each lecture/providing lots of examples/encourages participation/questions.”
FTV001
“She doesn't know what she's talking about.”
FTVD001

Remote format

Online

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and flexibility, but also heavy writing and some harsh grading.

Main concern

Online students , and writing without much handholding.

What students said

“Because this is an online asynchronous class, there is not much handholding but .”
FTVD001
“LOTS of homework.”
FTV001
“Not an easy A, expect to be challenged if creative writing isn't your strength.”
FTVD001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention midterms, finals, and papers, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, or strict proctoring.

MidtermFinalPapersNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and straightforward midterms, but do not clearly prove closed-book or .

TestsPaperStraightforward Midterms
“ and easy if you study a bit.”
FTVD001
“2 tests, 1 paper.”
FTVD001

Online

Online reviews mention a midterm, final, paper, and written answers, but .

MidtermFinalTerm PaperNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“Graded by 3 things: midterm, paper, final 75% of grade”
FTVD001
“Lectures+2 ”
FTV1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Not an easy A, expect to be challenged if creative writing isn't your strength.”

Voice snapshots generated from 32 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“Professor and all of the course material appears on canvas on day one so there is alot of time to get ahead of deadlines.”

⚖️

38/100

“Pointed out small things and because " "”

📚 Workload Reality

35/100

“By far the . I put in way more effort than I should've.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is very passionate about film and loves to talk about it with her students.
  • Her powerpoints were very detailed and provided a lot of video examples that helped me understand the material.
  • Lectures for 4 hours by reading segments of copy-pasted text off of powerpoint slides.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Great Professor was really lenient throughout the semester.
  • Very tough and .
  • A+ almost guaranteed, unless you're like me and your mental health just decided to ditch halfway through

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Weekly Discussions and Worksheets so only 2 assignments per week with the reading.
  • LOTS of homework.
  • Each worksheet has 10 questions, so you're writing 10 paragraphs each week.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

32

Recent reviews read by the AI

32

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 32 reviews across online and in-person formats from 2019 to 2025 with detailed and consistent themes.

Inside 32 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 56
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 511

Course coverage

FTVD00115 reviews
FTV00112 reviews
FTV15 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

24 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 4 · A 10 · A- 2

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 1 · B- 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3