AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Reading

Kristin Agius

EWRT2 · EWAT1A · EWRT001 · ERWT1 · EWRT1A · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
97/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

if you want a kind writing professor who makes improvement and and revision.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyGreat feedbackCaringBeginner friendlyRevision basedWriting workload
  • , and step-by-step writing support.
  • Getting an A is realistic, but several reviews say students must keep up with frequent writing and revision work.
  • The course is especially strong for students who want to .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

83/100

An A is very reachable through completion, revision, and feedback, but it is not effortless because writing work is frequent.

, while online reviews include both guaranteed-A language and workload warnings.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

The writing content is beginner friendly because she breaks improvement down clearly and supports weaker writers.

Both formats support beginner friendliness, but online reviews describe more workload pressure.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as mandatory or participation-based, even though a few sections are more flexible.

as mandatory, while in-person reviews vary but .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students recommend her because , and .

Recommendation is very strong in both formats, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

because students describe full credit for completion, revision chances, contract grading, and easy A paths.

Format shift

In-person reviews emphasize completion and revision credit, while and .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The work is usually easy but frequent, with , and weekly assignments.

Format shift

Online reviews include the strongest workload warning, while volume.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students , and ability to help weak writers improve.

Format shift

Both formats praise her strongly, with the .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

10/100

, and task completion rather than exams.

Format shift

Online and and revisions as the main assessment method.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews , and easy grading through completion and revision.

Main concern

and regular work is expected.

What students said

“Whole class is peer review, if you do all the if you're not the strongest writer”
EWRT001
“She gives a lot of work each week, but it's really easy!”
EWAT1A

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews say the class is supportive and grade-friendly, but one warns that .

Main concern

Online workload can be heavy if students are taking many other classes.

What students said

“If you're looking for an easy A GE, this is not the class.”
EWRT1A
“you will be guaranteed an easy A”
EWRT2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe portfolios, revision, and contract-style tasks, but they do not clearly prove a .

Portfolio FinalPeer ReviewRevision WorkContract Grading

Assessment risk

Varies

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and peer review, but they do not clearly prove exam format or .

Portfolio FinalPeer ReviewRevision Work
“The only thing is our final is a portfolio that is given to the English board”
EWAT1A
“Whole class is peer review”
EWRT001

Online

Online reviews mention weekly essays, EliReview tasks, and contract grading, but they do .

Weekly EssaysEliReview TasksContract Grading
“ ”
EWRT2
“ , and resubmit after revising”
EWRT1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If .”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and beginner support; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“ and actually breaks down how to improve your writing step by step.”

📈 Grade Path

83/100

“Just add the and you will get an A.”

📝 Workload Reality

45/100

“She gives a lot of work each week, but it's really easy!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and actually breaks down how to improve your writing step by step.
  • She supports every student, making the class enjoyable and the materials well-prepared.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You don't have to be a skilled writer to get an A.
  • As long as you do the online work that she provides consistently, this class is an easy A.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • There are reading and .
  • Don't suggest for ppl who have heavy courseloads bc the workload in this class is a lot.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 13 reviews span several years and consistently praise her, though only 3 online reviews are available.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

EWRT1A4 reviews
ERWT13 reviews
EWAT1A3 reviews
EWRT0012 reviews
EWRT21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 3 · A 6 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values