AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Paralegal Studies

Kevin Lee

PARA089 · PARA011 · PARA96A · PARA096 · PARA096A · PARA91A · PARA94 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
87.5%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you like law, can keep up with reading and participation, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear expectationsReading heavyDiscussion basedRespectful and personableMixed teaching depth
  • Most students recommend him for , and strong law-related discussion.
  • Grades can be manageable, but students must keep up with , and major writing tasks.
  • A few reviews criticize boredom, group work, or limited direct teaching, so the experience depends on learning style.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

An A is realistic when students complete readings and assignments, but the course still requires participation and legal writing work.

Online reviews include the clearest easy-A statement, while , and final-paper demands.

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

The material is not conceptually extreme, but , and legal memo work make it more than a simple class.

Online reviews are more positive and flexible, while and writing expectations.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

, though one online section was flexible with assignment deadlines.

Online evidence is mixed, while as required.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

, and useful law instruction, despite some mixed comments about style.

Online reviews are uniformly positive, while and a few teaching-style complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Grading appears manageable because students report , and flexible deadlines, but major papers still matter.

Format shift

Online reviews sound more lenient, while and final written work.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload is moderate because students mention , and a major legal memo.

Format shift

Online workload is helped by deadline flexibility, while and paper based.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Students often call him professional, personable, and clear, but some say the class can be boring or lacks enough direct teaching.

Format shift

Online reviews are consistently positive, while but still mostly favorable.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Assessment includes reading participation, group work, quizzes or exams in some courses, and .

Format shift

In-person reviews give more assessment detail, while and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and useful discussions, but some students find the class boring or group-work heavy.

Main concern

The Socratic and participation-heavy style may feel uncomfortable or inefficient for some students.

What students said

If you are interested in the .
PARA94
It's an easy class that's based on group work, which is unnecessary given that it's a writing class
PARA96A

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews describe him as flexible, respectful, and recommendable, with reading and participation still important.

Main concern

Online evidence is limited and .

What students said

Very flexible with day of the quarter.
PARA011
Treats students with respect and like they're adults
PARA089

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because one review says quizzes and exams are reasonable, while other and participation.

Reasonable Quizzes and ExamsFinal PaperParticipation WorkGroup Work

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention reasonable quizzes and exams in one section and policy proved.

Reasonable Quizzes and ExamsFinal PaperGroup Work
His quizzes and and straightforward.
PARA94
80% of grade is the
PARA096A

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, quiz, midterm, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

If you are interested in the .

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and mixed concerns; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

Professor Lee is in the top 3 professors I've ever had and not just at De Anza or in community college, but in university as well.

📚 Difficulty Balance

56/100

As long as you do the .

👍 Recommendation Rate

86/100

Although professional and detailed in his approach, Professor Lee is personable and fun.

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Course work was thorough and .
  • He is a fan of the Socratic method so be sure to complete assigned reading or you will feel put on the spot.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

  • Stay on top of the work and it's an easy A class.
  • As long as you do the .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • His class can be pretty boring at times and he likes to poke fun at students as a way of getting them to participate.
  • It's an easy class that's based on group work, which is unnecessary given that it's a writing class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 10 reviews span many years with useful detail, but several are old and only 3 are online.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PARA944 reviews
PARA0111 review
PARA0891 review
PARA0961 review
PARA096A1 review
Show 2 more courses
PARA91A1 review
PARA96A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 3

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Audit/No Grade 1