AI Rate Professor

English

Ken Weisner

EWRT97 · EWRTD200 · EWRT1 · ELIT11 · ELIT011 · EWRT2 · EWRIT2A · EWRTD030 · POETRYWRITING · EWRT41 · EWRT041 · EWRT30 · EWRT2A · EWRT1A · 114 lifetime ratings

AI rating
75/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
67.5%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you enjoy writing and , but avoid him for a low-effort online EWRT2 experience.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and supportiveStrong feedbackWriting-heavy workloadTough essay gradingSlow grading and replies
  • Students , and passion for writing.
  • Grades can be good, but essays and weekly writing require real effort.
  • Online EWRT2 reviews are much riskier because , and little guidance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many students earned A-range grades, but , and adapting to his preferences matter.

Online evidence is more uneven because creative writing looks easy while online EWRT2 can feel harsh; in-person evidence more often says effort and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The material is usually approachable English and writing work, but the class can feel demanding because of , and .

Online courses vary by course number, while as accessible but lecture-heavy.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

35/100

Several reviews list attendance as mandatory, while a .

, but in-person comments more clearly connect missed classes to grade risk.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Most positive reviews recommend him for care and feedback, but a strong negative and poor online support.

In-person recommendations are steadier, while online recommendations depend heavily on course and term.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Grades are often high, but many students call him a and fit with his expectations.

Format shift

Online EWRT2 has more harsh-grading complaints, while feedback.

Workload

Moderate

46/100

Workload usually includes , so it is manageable but not light.

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly posts and writing volume more often; , and attendance.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students often describe him as caring, passionate, and helpful, but , and delayed feedback.

Format shift

In-person teaching is praised more consistently, while online teaching has a and responsiveness risk.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

24/100

Assessment appears centered , and portfolios rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Both formats are assignment-heavy, with online comments especially emphasizing posts, essays, and weekly submissions.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

28 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are generally more positive about his passion, personal support, and class engagement, though attendance and .

Main concern

, and tough essay grading frustrate some students.

What students said

“Weisner has long in-class lectures and monologues that are mandatory”
ELIT011
“Prof. , and super passionate about teaching.”
EWRT1

Remote format

Online

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews and harsh EWRT2 complaints about delayed grading and weak communication.

Main concern

Some online students and .

What students said

“Online students .”
EWRT2
“This is the most enjoyable online class I've ever taken.”
EWRT30

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and portfolio work than to strict traditional exams.

Open Note QuizzesPortfolio FinalEssay-Based AssessmentReviews Do Not Prove Strict Proctoring

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews explicitly mention easy open-note quizzes and writing-based work, but they do .

Open Note QuizzesEasy QuizzesEssay-Based AssessmentNo Clear Strict Exam Evidence
“The and were very easy”
EWRT2A
“ each.”
EWRT1A

Online

Online reviews mention essays, posts, weekly writing, and a , but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or .

Portfolio FinalWeekly WritingEssay-Based AssessmentNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“The final is a portfolio consisting of 15-20 pages of our work from the quarter.”
EWRT30
“Three essays, 2-3 posts per week.”
EWRT2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Ken is such a caring teacher. He leaves detailed and , and he truly strives for his students to benefit from the material aside from just getting a grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting recurring themes in , and online support; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“He leaves detailed and ”

⚖️ Grade Effort

68/100

“A is attainable if you put in some effort.”

⚠️ Online Risk

55/100

“If you have questions about essays, you are left to your own to figure it out.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Prof. , and super passionate about teaching.
  • He is a but he will give you one on one feed back !
  • This class was okay. Mr. Weisner cares for his students but is very boring during his lectures.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • If you do all the work and the .
  • It's extremely easy to get an A.
  • you will hardly receive an A for trying hard.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • I've never taken an online class before, and this professor made it easy.
  • He does not grade any of the quarter.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

114

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

The dataset has 50 reviews across many years and both formats, with detailed and consistent themes , and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 563
4 out of 523
3 out of 513
2 out of 55
1 out of 510

Course coverage

EWRT222 reviews
EWRT1A6 reviews
EWRT305 reviews
ELIT0114 reviews
EWRT2A3 reviews
Show 9 more courses
EWRT0412 reviews
ELIT111 review
EWRIT2A1 review
EWRT11 review
EWRT411 review
EWRT971 review
EWRTD0301 review
EWRTD2001 review
POETRYWRITING1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

27 reported outcomes

A range

20

A+ 3 · A 16 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 4 · B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1