AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Nicholas Baiamonte

PHI3 · PHIL008 · PHIL001 · PHIL101 · PHIL18 · PHIL3 · PHIL003 · 278 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
69.66%
Difficulty
1.7

The decision

Take Nicholas Baiamonte for a very easy grade if you accept the textbook cost and do not need strong teaching.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy AExpensive textbookLow teaching valueMultiple attemptsSelf-paced online work
  • Students overwhelmingly describe the course as an easy A with multiple attempts and fast completion.
  • The biggest concern is the required expensive Learning Tree or textbook access.
  • Teaching quality is polarizing because many students say they learned little or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

95/100

The grade is repeatedly described as nearly automatic because of multiple , and fast completion.

Online reviews are the strongest easy-A evidence, while pattern.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

88/100

Most students say the course material is simple and can be finished quickly, though a few PHIL008 reviews report harsh grading.

Online sections are usually described as easiest, while in-person PHIL008 has more negative difficulty outliers.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

88/100

Most reviews say attendance is not mandatory or describe asynchronous work with no meetings.

, while some in-person PHIL008 reviews list attendance as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

for teaching quality or learning value.

, while in-person reviews are more course-dependent and include stronger warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

86/100

Multiple attempts, revealed answers, short papers, and many A .

Format shift

Online reviews give the , and many in-person reviews match it.

Workload

Light

78/100

Work is recurring but , and often finishable in days or weeks.

Format shift

Online workload is usually very light and self-paced, while a and PHIL008 reviews mention more assignments or pop quizzes.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

Some students enjoy him, but many say he barely teaches, gives little feedback, or relies on the paid textbook system.

Format shift

Online reviews contain the strongest complaints about limited teaching, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

Assessment commonly uses quizzes, exams, discussions, and a and exams carrying much of the experience.

Format shift

Online reviews repeatedly mention Learning Tree exams and quizzes, while and paper structures.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews also often call the class easy, but PHIL008 in-person reviews include , and uninspiring teaching.

Main concern

In-person PHIL008 looks riskier than the easy online-style sections.

What students said

“ if you want an easy A+ for $170”
PHIL001
“save urself and ”
PHIL008
“Guaranteed A lmao”
PHIL003

Remote format

Online

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews strongly describe self-paced , and expensive required course materials.

Main concern

Many online students complain about cost, limited teaching, and .

What students said

“you could finish the whole course in a week if you wanted to”
PHIL003
“Multiple tries for exams & quizzes.”
PHIL003
“Baiamonte does not teach the class”
PHIL001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are usually student-friendly because many reviews mention multiple attempts, revealed answers, and easy finals.

Multiple AttemptsAnswers RevealedUnlimited Practice QuizzesShort Final PaperNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and multiple attempts, but some PHIL008 reviews mention pop quizzes and do not clearly prove proctoring rules.

Multiple AttemptsShort Final PaperPop Quiz RiskNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“Every test has 2 attempts and you can see the correct answers after the 1st attempt.”
PHIL001
“The final is a short 10 question quiz and a 2 page paper.”
PHIL001
“Beware of pop quizzes”
PHIL008

Online

Online reviews mention multiple attempts, revealed answers, unlimited practice quizzes, and no meetings, but do not clearly prove webcam or .

Multiple AttemptsAnswers RevealedUnlimited Practice QuizzesNo MeetingsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“multiple tries for exams & quizzes”
PHIL003
“the answers are revealed on the first one”
PHIL001
“Quizzes and ”
PHIL3

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you want an easy A+ for $170”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in grades, cost, teaching quality, and . Credibility rating: High.

📈 Easy A Signal

95/100

“Easiest A in my entire life.”

💸 Cost Concern

30/100

“Pay for a grade.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“Baiamonte does not teach the class”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Easiest A in my entire life.
  • easiest class ever just pay for the textbook.
  • Guaranteed A lmao

Theme 2

💸 About Cost

  • Pay for a grade.
  • you'll need to pay for a $180 textbook.
  • Turned out to be my most expensive class.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Baiamonte does not teach the class
  • if you want to learn anything.
  • Great teacher, easily understandable course material, lectures were funny and engaging.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

278

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across online and in-person formats give very , and uneven teaching.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5157
4 out of 556
3 out of 526
2 out of 516
1 out of 523

Course coverage

PHIL00317 reviews
PHIL00817 reviews
PHIL00111 reviews
PHI32 reviews
PHIL1011 review
Show 2 more courses
PHIL181 review
PHIL31 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

50 reported outcomes

A range

39

A+ 9 · A 30

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

4

C+ 3 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 3