AI Rate Professor

English

John Gravener

ENG1A · EWRT13 · EWRT1B · ENG1B · EWRT2 · EWRT1C · EWRIT2 · D00219 · EWRT211 · EWRT1A · 78 lifetime ratings

AI rating
67/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if and can handle uneven feedback.

Best fit · Effort For RewardFunny discussion leaderHeavy readingLate feedback riskAccessible when responsiveMixed grading clarity
  • Students often like his humor and class discussions.
  • The main risk is delayed or and grades.
  • Grades can be manageable, but the workload and teacher involvement vary a lot.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is realistic for organized students, but reading, essays, and A.

Online evidence is easier and more structured, while because feedback and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The content is regular English reading and writing, but the reading volume and .

Online comments describe simple weekly tasks, while and more demanding writing.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

, but others describe participation or attendance as important.

Online reviews mostly show flexible attendance, while .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

Students recommend him for humor and engagement, but and .

Online reviews are mostly favorable except one strong warning, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Some students call him lenient or easy, but and .

Format shift

Online grading looks easier overall, while .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of reading, essays, discussions, and homework.

Format shift

Online workload ranges from very light to heavy, while and writing.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

He can be funny, engaging, and helpful, but and absences hurt the experience.

Format shift

Online students value quick messages in some terms, while and late returned work.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades appear , and papers rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats mainly use writing assignments, with online reviews also mentioning weekly quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews praise his humor and discussions but , and late returned work.

Main concern

Feedback and .

What students said

“ . We were supposed to write 4-5 essays throughout the quarter, and we only wrote 2.”
EWRT1A
“ so you never know your stance in the class.”
EWRT1A

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly positive, with easy weekly tasks, free materials, and one .

Main concern

Asynchronous .

What students said

“Really easy online summer class, a couple group discussions + individual assignments every week, takes about 5-15 minutes per assignment to finish”
EWRT1B
“You will get no feedback on any of your work (including the ) and no grade until the very last week of the class or so.”
EWRIT2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and occasional quizzes carrying more weight than formal exams.

No Quizzes Or Tests In One SectionTake-Home Final EssayWeekly Online Quizzes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention no quizzes or tests in one class and a , but do not clearly prove proctoring or .

No Quizzes Or TestsTake-Home Final Essay
“ .”
EWRT1A
“ .”
EWRT1A

Online

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam .

Weekly Quizzes
“a ”
EWRT1B
“There , and group discussions.”
EWRT2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! He is endlessly funny but also exceedingly competent and capable.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and feedback. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“ ! He is endlessly funny but also exceedingly competent and capable.”

⚠️

35/100

“ so you never know your stance in the class.”

📚 Workload

35/100

“You do need to do a lot of writing and reading, but he will help you as much as you need to develop ideas and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The class discussion are often funny and thought provoking.
  • John was phenomenal.
  • Class was interesting and fun.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • If you simply want an easy teacher who hands out A's, John's class is not the .
  • He is a , but fair, and willing to work with you if you want a better grade.

Theme 3

📝

  • never returned any work back.
  • so you never know your stance in the class.
  • Found the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

78

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 50 reviews across many years and formats, with consistent themes about discussion quality, workload, and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 543
4 out of 514
3 out of 59
2 out of 55
1 out of 57

Course coverage

EWRT1A25 reviews
EWRT1B9 reviews
EWRT2116 reviews
ENG1A3 reviews
EWRT22 reviews
Show 5 more courses
D002191 review
ENG1B1 review
EWRIT21 review
EWRT131 review
EWRT1C1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 1 · A- 2

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 3 · Not_Sure_Yet 1