AI Rate Professor

Health

Barbara Liechty

NUTR10 · HEALTH21 · NUTRITION21 · NUTRO10 · HLTH21 · NUTRI10 · NUT10 · HEALT21 · HEALTH1 · 72 lifetime ratings

AI rating
79/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
68.29%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you want a manageable grade boost, but be cautious with Nutrition because exams and support get mixed reviews.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEasy A with extra creditCaring and responsiveClear grading criteriaTimed exams can be stressfulNutrition courses are riskier
  • Health courses are repeatedly described as easy A classes with few assignments and strong .
  • Teaching reviews are split because many students praise her kindness while others say online nutrition courses lack guidance.
  • tests with specific or confusing questions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Most students report A or A+ , and straightforward work, though some Nutrition exams make the A less effortless.

Online evidence strongly supports easy A in Health but shows more risk in Nutrition, while and mostly easy with a .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

73/100

The course content is usually basic health or nutrition material, but and .

Online reviews describe self-paced simple content with , while in-person reviews describe straightforward reading with occasional difficult tests.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

68/100

Many reviews say attendance is not mandatory, but several online records mark attendance as .

Online flexibility varies because some courses are asynchronous while others restrict pacing, and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

and grade-friendly, but several Nutrition reviews advise against her due to poor support and exams.

Online recommendations are polarized by course, while but less numerous.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Grades are often boosted by , few graded items, and easy assignments, but and specific questions.

Format shift

Online grading looks very lenient in Health but stricter in Nutrition, while reports.

Workload

Light

76/100

Most reviews describe few assignments, discussion posts, readings, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online workload is usually light or manageable but and , while in-person workload is generally straightforward.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Students often call her caring and responsive, but negative reviews say she gives limited help and does not prepare students well for exams.

Format shift

Online teaching quality is more divided because independent courses expose guidance issues, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Many courses are driven by exams and assignments.

Format shift

Online reviews mention exams most often, while and exam-heavy sections.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews lean positive for Health, with easy assignments and helpful communication, but a .

Main concern

A minority of as hard, rushed, or confusing.

What students said

“ and she grades super easy.”
HLTH21
“Lost of readings, but really straight forward.”
HEALT21
“ time to finish it, 30 questions in 40mins”
HLTH21

Remote format

Online

36 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly easy-grade positive for Health courses but sharply mixed for and weak guidance.

Main concern

, and not well supported by the provided materials.

What students said

“The asynchronous course was enjoyable as the professor is very kind and actually cares about her students.”
HEALTH21
“This class is an easy A!”
HLTH21
“I always felt rushed. (60 min for 50-60 question exam)”
NUTR10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and some open-book online exams, but do not clearly prove webcam or proctoring rules.

Timed ExamsMultiple Choice ExamsOpen BookExtra Credit ExamFew Assignments

Assessment risk

Varies

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

section and hard timed exams in others, but they do not clearly prove closed-book or .

No TestsTimed ExamsHard Exams
“ and she grades super easy.”
HLTH21
“All of your grade are based on 5 exams and 1 exam.”
HLTH21
“30 questions in 40 minutes is difficult when she adds in "matching" definitions.”
NUTR10

Online

Online reviews , and , but they do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring rules.

Timed ExamsOpen BookMultiple Choice ExamsExtra Credit Exam
“ ".”
HLTH21
“ , and open book.”
NUTR10
“You also can only take tests on random days she decides, you cannot work ahead or self-pace.”
NUTR10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This prof is so cool. Theres like 4-5 discussion assignments that are a lot of and thats basically it. and she grades super easy.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“ though! and responsive.”

📈 Easy A Potential

88/100

“Easy A. Super straight forward class structure. Plenty of - got a 107%.”

⚠️

65/100

“The but the !!!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The asynchronous course was enjoyable as the professor is very kind and actually cares about her students.
  • She gets back to emails quickly and the class itself is pretty easy.
  • Barbara Liechty is no help at all and does nothing to prepare you for the exams

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class is an easy A!
  • Easy class if you want a GPA boost.
  • Really easy A given that you skim through the textbook and do all the homework.

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • ".
  • Three exams, one written assignment (2 pages), and an exam worth 14%.
  • time to finish it, 30 questions in 40mins

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

72

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 50 reviews across many years and both formats, with consistent themes around easy grading, , and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 529
4 out of 59
3 out of 511
2 out of 511
1 out of 512

Course coverage

HLTH2121 reviews
NUTR1010 reviews
HEALT216 reviews
HEALTH214 reviews
HEALTH12 reviews
Show 4 more courses
NUT102 reviews
NUTRI102 reviews
NUTRO102 reviews
NUTRITION211 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

35 reported outcomes

A range

29

A+ 16 · A 12 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

2

D+ 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1