AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Andrew Wood

HUMI001 · HUMIO1 · HUMI6 · HUMID001 · HUMI1 · HUMI01 · HUMI16 · HUMI02 · D001 · HUMANITIES1 · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
64%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you can handle lots of reading and long lectures for a fair, usually grade-friendly humanities class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLecture HeavyHeavy ReadingStrong FeedbackLenient GradingEngaging When Interested
  • Students often praise Andrew Wood as passionate, caring, and .
  • The course is usually grade-friendly, but , and .
  • The main risk is long lecture time, which some students find engaging and others find boring.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Getting an A is realistic because grading is often lenient, but students , and essays on time.

Both formats support a grade-friendly course, while online evidence is limited to two reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

57/100

The content is manageable, but dense readings, long lectures, and easy class.

Online reviews sound more reading-intensive, while on lecture tolerance.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Attendance rules vary by section, with some reviews saying mandatory and .

Online evidence is split, and required.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

69/100

and feedback, but negative reviews warn about boredom and heavy reading.

Online reviews are positive, while because lecture style divides students.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Students repeatedly mention easy A outcomes, few graded items, generous scores, and .

Format shift

Both formats show lenient or .

Workload

Moderate

42/100

The workload centers on lots of reading, weekly discussions, and several papers, but many students call it doable.

Format shift

Online reviews describe intense reading, while if consistent.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students , and depth, but long lecture delivery is a repeated weakness.

Format shift

Online reviews praise feedback and useful lectures, while and boring lectures.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Grades appear mostly based on papers, readings, discussion posts, and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize essays and discussions, while and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show a lecture-heavy class with lots of reading, papers, and generally fair or .

Main concern

Long lectures and up with.

What students said

“Easy A if you finish your work on time.”
HUMI001
“He talks, a LOT.”
HUMI1
“Easy A as long as you put the effort in and stay consistent.”
HUMI1

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews , and very helpful feedback.

Main concern

The and prerecorded lecture audio may be uneven.

What students said

“Intense amount of readings and music to analyze.”
HUMI02
“ and always gives HUGE feedbacks .”
D001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

paper work, while reviews do not clearly prove strict proctoring or open-book policies.

Written MidtermFinal PaperEssay-Based AssessmentTopics Given Before Midterm

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and , but do not clearly prove open-book or strict proctoring rules.

Written ExamsMidtermFinal PaperTopics Given Before Midterm
“ and no written homework, just 3 main essays and discussion posts.”
HUMI01
“ .”
HUMI1
“2 papers (2-3 pages each), written midterm+final paper 6 (pgs).”
HUMANITIES1
“The beforehand so you can study them.”
HUMI1

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy A as long as you put the effort in and stay consistent.”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Extremely passionate about the topics and gave engaging lectures.”

📈 Effort To Get An A

78/100

“Easy A if you finish your work on time.”

⚖️

78/100

“ and gives everyone a 29/30.”

📚 Workload Reality

42/100

“He and doesn't give .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are very thought-provoking and the workload is very normal for a college student.
  • He talks, a LOT.
  • Awesome lectures! He's very knowledgable and passionate about his work.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Tons of , but if you are falling behind on those, make sure to attend his lectures as .
  • The passages assigned are very long and confusing.
  • The workload was doable with and three 5-7p essays over the quarter.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • Easy A but
  • The only things part of your grade are 2 papers, 1 midterm, and the final!
  • though, I only took notes on what was on them and I've so far.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 25 detailed reviews across 2016 to 2024 with , and grading.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 52
3 out of 58
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HUMI19 reviews
HUMI013 reviews
Humi163 reviews
D0012 reviews
HUMI0012 reviews
Show 5 more courses
HUMI62 reviews
HUMANITIES11 review
HUMI021 review
HUMID0011 review
HUMIO11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

21 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 3 · A 9 · A- 3

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2